republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Charter Line monitors ·Help us help you ·Are you Infected? ·Ph Svc Areas ·Atlantic BB FORUM
AuthorAll Replies


Metatron2008
Premium
join:2008-09-02
Stockbridge, GA
Reviews:
·Charter
·Clearwire Wireless

reply to goillini

Re: Can you see a difference: Charter HD Vs. AT&T U-Verse HD

said by goillini:

said by BF69:

Actually Directv pakages are CHEAPER than Charter and you get more channels.
If you only have 1 or 2 TVs in your house, then yes, DirecTV will probably be cheaper than Charter. More than 2 TVs, however, and it's not so clear, as DirecTV charges $5/receiver/month for additional receivers. My parents and my in-laws both have 5 TVs at their houses. They'd be paying DirecTV an additional $20/month for receivers where they currently pay nothing for analog expanded basic service.

To answer the original question, I've had both Charter HD and Uverse HD. I like the HD picture on Charter better -- the picture on Uverse was very dark, so anything with dimly lit scenes was very hard to watch. I've since found out there was some sort of buried setting we could have tweaked on the Uverse receiver that may have fixed the issue, but my wife hated Uverse (the DVR was terrible ... crashed, wasn't user-friendly, lacked basic functionality/features), so we switched back to Charter and got an HD Tivo. I liked the HD lineup on Uverse a lot better though. Charter's HD lineup is pathetic.
Charter also charges $5 a receiver if you get HD, And charter charges an extra $15 for each dvr.

Saturday, 02-Jun 01:20:01 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics