CR123
join:2006-11-04
Vancouver, BC | reply to Glowduke
Re: [ON] No DSL without a Bell line?? said by Glowduke:I would be surprised if the CRTC allowed a single company to have a monopoly in one building. It happens. A lot more in Ontario than out west. It might not be an 'exclusive' arrangement - it might be that the developer and Bell decide not to do business together - which is probably legal, according to the CRTC. A similar situation happened with some new greenfield developments in Ontario, where Bell is not entering the neighbourhoods, but Rogers and the developer have reached a deal.
I'm sure someone here knows whether there is Bell plant in Cityplace - from the answers the OP is getting, not likely. If not, no Bell, and no company that leases Bell copper.
--
- The content of this post is my opinion, and does not reflect the opinions of my employer. - |
|
1 edit | Are the fiber fed apartments we have in Edmonton and Calgary telus service only?
Edit: Nevermind, they have shaw cable as well. Just get a pretty sweet deal with Telus. |
|
|
|
Glowduke
join:2009-03-14
Calgary, AB
kudos:4 | Too Both CanGumby and CR123:
ALL Buildings must be fed by the Incumbent Local Exchange Company, and as such is required to lease facilities to CLECs. So wether the builder and the ILEC get along will have no baring on arrangements.
In the cases of Edmonton and Calgary, TELUS is the ILEC and does have copper cables or "Digital Tie-Cables" available to the CLECS.
Not trying to be rude, just want to bring to light that the CRTC does have quite a bit of say.
--
The views expressed herein are that of my own and not necessarily that of my employer or any associated entities. |
|
CR123
join:2006-11-04
Vancouver, BC | »Damn, have to leave Teksavvy in about a year
»www.mintohomes.com/Ottawa/whatsNew/bell.asp
Unless the rules are different for MDU's vs greenfield housing developments, this seems to indicate that the ILEC is able to not service a building, in certain circumstances. |
|
