Search:  

 
 
   All ForumsHot TopicsGallery






how-to block ads


 
Forums » US Cable Support » Road Runner » Dallas TX - Downgraded & getting same throughput
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
286
Share Topic:
RSS topic:
toggle:
flat / full
normal / watch
Posting:
Post a:
Post a:
"Upgrade" to RoadRunner Turbo. »
« Road Runner NYC 100 MBPS?  
AuthorAll Replies

oldbrit

join:2009-07-08
Dallas, TX
·RoadRunner Cable

Dallas TX - Downgraded & getting same throughput

I had the Road Runner Turbo service. When I did a test on speakeasy or dslreports, I got the expected download and upload connectivity, but the actual throughput was radically different. In fact, when I used the RR throughput test, I was actually getting a much lower speed.

So, I downgraded my service from 10mbps to 1.5mbps. I get the lower numbers on the speakeasy and dslreports tests, but on the RR throughput test, I got a slightly better throughput at the new, lower speed than I was getting at the higher speed. Here's the throughput test: »www.austin.rr.com/speedtest/speed.asp

I made the change because the slower speed is MUCH cheaper and it matched the actual throughput I was getting.

In doing various tests, I was finding that I had high latency, with the highest latencies being some of the Road Runner servers on the route.

I was also finding a significant packet loss using smokeping. The packet loss seems to be lower at the lower connection speed than it was at the higher.

NOW, I AM GUESSING THAT any improvements noted are due to random chance and have nothing to do with the connection speed.

BUT, I expect that when I am hitting a lot of websites at once, downloading multiple files, etc., I will see a slowdown from the faster service.

THE POINT IS THIS (I'd like some confirmation on this from others):

You may be throwing your money away on the fastest connection if the overall infrastructure affecting your throughput doesn't really take advantage of your fast connection.

I'll see how this goes, but I may go back to AT&T now that they have dry DSL (DSL that doesn't require a phone line), because when I was on DSL (AT&T, Speakeasy, and Quest), I was on a high-end package, the throughput was excellent, the latency was better, and there was significantly less packet loss. I switched to Cable because it was less expensive for similar advertised performance and because I switched from land-line phones to VOIP - which meant I couldn't have AT&T DSL, Qwest is no longer available here, and Speakeasy was really expensive.

Anyway, I'm curious to see whether other's experience (and some time on the slower service) confirm what I am seeing so far.

Liz
-
Forums » US Cable Support » Road Runner"Upgrade" to RoadRunner Turbo. »
« Road Runner NYC 100 MBPS?  


Sunday, 06-Dec 09:02:30 Terms of Use | Privacy Policy | Hosting by www.nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo | feedback | contact
over 10 years online! © 1999-2009 dslreports.com.republican-creole
page compression OFF
Most commented news this week
· [163] Comcast Releasing Promised Usage Meter
· [147] Avast Antivirus Has Gone Mad
· [128] Comcast Makes NBC Universal Acquisition Official
· [125] The Bandwidth Hog Does Not Exist
· [105] Graduate Student Unveils Sprint's GPS Sharing With Feds
· [101] Google Invades ISP, OpenDNS Turf With Google Public DNS
· [85] FCC Ponders Moving From PSTN To IP Voice
· [82] Latest Consumer Reports Survey Not Kind To AT&T
· [81] New Bill Aims To Limit ETFs
· [75] Sprint Defuses GPS Privacy Media Bomb
Most people now reading
· Wife might have to work in.... Iowa for a few months!!! [General Questions]
· Problems with rlslog.net? [TekSavvy]
· [DNS] Google's public DNS... performance increases? [Comcast HSI]
· False positive in Avast! or is it real? [Security]
· Windows 7 boot manager editing questions [Microsoft Help]
· 3.x Feral Druid - Bear Tanking Guide [World of Warcraft]
· Is there any true cure for, or way to prevent, a hangover? [General Questions]
· How fast is your upstream internet connection? [General Questions]
· hardest class for new player to level [World of Warcraft]