site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Posting?
Post a:
Post a:
Links: ·Forum Rules ·Forum FAQ ·Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management ·Copyright Infringement?
AuthorAll Replies


usa2k
Blessed
Premium,MVM
join:2003-01-26
Canton, MI
kudos:3
Reviews:
·VOIPo
·WOW Internet and..

reply to jlivingood

Re: [DNS] Comcast Launches Trial of Domain Helper Service

This should work like a lead balloon!

»Invalid URL Redirects?

»news.cnet.com/2100-1032_3-5086101.html

Very BAD idea. Good name for it though


freebird317
Premium
join:2004-02-23
Portland, OR
Reviews:
·Comcast

said by usa2k:

This should work like a lead balloon!

»Invalid URL Redirects?

»news.cnet.com/2100-1032_3-5086101.html

Very BAD idea. Good name for it though
I agree with you it is sicking to see corp desire to only care about making as much $$$ as possible. However I am not so sure it will fail as others have how ever. Most users are ignorant when it comes to such a thing, even members on the very form.
--
Lead, Follow I do not care just get out of my way.


nate1234

join:2008-08-21

Maybe they can use the money from this to fund network expansion, and remove the 250gb cap?



freebird317
Premium
join:2004-02-23
Portland, OR
Reviews:
·Comcast

said by nate1234:

Maybe they can use the money from this to fund network expansion, and remove the 250gb cap?
Not likely.
--
Lead, Follow I do not care just get out of my way.


nate1234

join:2008-08-21

I know, I was just joking... It would be nice though


AVonGauss
Premium
join:2007-11-01
Boynton Beach, FL

reply to nate1234
I am not really a fan of DNS redirection for many of the reasons already stated here and in the news article comments, but I do want to commend the process in which this system is being rolled out. Its good to see the trend of Comcast being more open and forthcoming about changes continuing.

The burden definitely is not all Comcast's, but what I would be much more interested in seeing from any IETF efforts is a plan to correct what is broken by DNS redirection. Marketing spins aside, DNS redirection by ISPs is really about additional ad revenue and name branding which means it is primarily (if not solely) targeting the user and more specifically browser related services such as http, https, ftp, ftps - gopher?

If DNS redirection is going to be implemented by ISPs as an opt-out system, there really should be efforts to address the issues caused at the browser level (caching, history, etc) and mechanisms established that allow other services such as SSH, POP, IMAP, SMTP and VPNs to continue to receive the NXDOMAIN responses as originally intended and currently specified in the standards. This is also something needed by networks such as WiFi hot spots or other semi-public networks that require a login and use DNS redirection to provide the user a login page. In this case, its not so much of the NXDOMAIN response as it is selectively redirecting browser requests vs all requests from all types of services.

Not trying to be preachy, but something I think all ISPs should remember; your customers are paying you for a service. They are not signing up to be an audience for ads that you are selling or reselling and while they will tolerate it to a point, there is definitely a threshold to that tolerance at which the customer will start to devalue your service no matter how well that service performs.



N3OGH
Yo Soy Col. "Bat" Guano
Premium
join:2003-11-11
Philly burbs
kudos:1

reply to freebird317
Well, SOMEONE has got to pay for those funny turtles.


--
Petty people are disproportionably corrupted by petty power…



usa2k
Blessed
Premium,MVM
join:2003-01-26
Canton, MI
kudos:3

So as long as I continue to use DNS 4.2.2.2 and 4.2.2.4
I should be immune from the redirection.
That is how I opted out on WideOpenWest Cable.



AVD
Respice, Adspice, Prospice
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Onion, NJ

said by usa2k:

So as long as I continue to use DNS 4.2.2.2 and 4.2.2.4
I should be immune from the redirection.
That is how I opted out on WideOpenWest Cable.
They can hijack your DNS settings.
--
Team JON.


pokesph
It Is Almost Fast
Premium
join:2001-06-25
Sacramento, CA
kudos:1

said by AVD:

said by usa2k:

So as long as I continue to use DNS 4.2.2.2 and 4.2.2.4
I should be immune from the redirection.
That is how I opted out on WideOpenWest Cable.
They can hijack your DNS settings.
I sure hope not.. I also use 3rd party DNS to aviod issues just like this topic.
--
Webmaster - Steve
- - - - - - - - - - - -
»www.1-gb.net
»www.ppnstudio.com

NormanS
Premium,MVM
join:2001-02-14
San Jose, CA
kudos:4
Reviews:
·SONIC.NET
·Pacific Bell - SBC

reply to AVD

said by AVD:

They can hijack your DNS settings.
Comcast has already stated that they will not.
--
Norman
~Oh Lord, why have you come
~To Konnyu, with the Lion and the Drum

PittsPgh
Premium
join:2003-08-21
Pittsburgh, PA
kudos:1

reply to N3OGH

said by N3OGH:

Well, SOMEONE has got to pay for those funny turtles.


I thought they needed to pay for the drugs that freaked out rabbit is on! LOL


AVD
Respice, Adspice, Prospice
Premium
join:2003-02-06
Onion, NJ

reply to NormanS

said by NormanS:

said by AVD:

They can hijack your DNS settings.
Comcast has already stated that they will not.
I never said they do or would, I just said that they can.
--
standard disclaimers apply.

Saturday, 02-Jun 19:09:36 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics