site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


charter_user

@charter.com

reply to pspcrazy

Re: Define Failure

said by pspcrazy:

Yes that is what we call a failure, it seems like he hasn't made the user experience any better, not the speeds, nor the customer service. All he's done is pocketed the company money. A company which hasn't turned a profit for 10 years, shouldn't exist period. 2-4 years loss is normal, 10 is just laughable.
Well it's too bad Karl's article is about Neil Smit and his management team, and not about Charter as a whole, or your argument may hold some validity. You openly admit 2-4 years is normal, and Neil and his team have been in place about what, maybe 3? So your willing to criticize, but you don't logically follow your own view points?

Yes, Charter has not been profitable, per say, in 10 years, but Neil and his team have only been there a small stint. When they come out of Chapter 11 and start turning a profit, then what will Karl and the rest of the cable hating clones start whining about?


Bor

@telus.net

said by charter_user
Yes, Charter has not been profitable, per say, in 10 years, but Neil and his team have only been there a small stint. When they come out of Chapter 11 and start turning a profit, then what will Karl and the rest of the cable hating clones start whining about?
[/BQUOTE :


If anyone thought that was really going to happen, the stock price would reflect it.


borats

@tds.net

Bor
If anyone thought that was really going to happen, the stock price would reflect it.
The stock is already worthless so what's your point? Newsflash!! That's what going in bankruptcy protection means. The stock no longer has value, so your point is quite moot.

Tuesday, 21-May 10:44:57 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 13.5 years online © 1999-2013 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics