DavesnothereNo-BHELL-ity DOES have its Advantages
join:2009-06-15
START&Cogeco
kudos:6
2 edits | reply to MaynardKrebs
Fine Print, My A%$ ! Although Bell's weasel, er, I mean legal team has determined that it is OK from a purely legal perspective to banish the important part of the details to 'Fine Print Land', as far as I'm concerned, when you do it to deliberately deceive your OWN customers, it should still legally be called 'False' advertising rather than 'Misleading'.
Sort of how there is First and Second degree murder, maybe we could call the charge 'False Advertising, Second Degree', or something.
Come to think of it, since it was deliberate and premeditated, the charge should read 'First Degree' !
Those clowns are walking a fine line, and trying to split every hair that they can, regarding stuff like this, and Lord knows, I haven't many left to split ! [Dave runs hand over shiney head]
Shame on Bell !
As a corporation, they haven't learned a thing over the years, about fair and honest business practices.
(Actually, chances are the HAVE learned, but keep the knowledge to themselves.)
[/rant, for now]
 |
