 | reply to DarkLogix
Re: I assume RG6 for in-home cabling? How much does RG11 cost for 75ft? |
|
 K PattersonPremium,MVM join:2006-03-12 Columbus, OH kudos:1 | Not sure, but not much.
The issue is the connectors, stripper and crimper. Figure around $100 for a decent set. |
|
 1 edit | not too bad... I might go for that at some point. I found some online for ~$90-100 |
|
 DarkLogixPremium join:2008-10-23 Baytown, TX kudos:3 | reply to nate1234 I'd have to relook it up but about .35 per foot more where I bought mine and the tools cost more than RG6 tools I paid about $60 for 100FT w/ 4 connectors and no tools |
|
 | reply to nate1234 You don't install RG-11 in a regular house. RG-11 is use for very long service drop (150'-300') from the pole to the house. There's no difference in signal strength between 75' of RG-6 and 75' of RG-11. We will only see a lower lost on higher frequencies when the cable drop is very long, not on short distance.
Connectors are bigger and difficult ton install behind a wall plate, it's really overkill for 75'. |
|
 | well, should they use it for my new drop that is happening soon? it is 180ft |
|
 DarkLogixPremium join:2008-10-23 Baytown, TX kudos:3 | reply to RG11overkill All cable has a percent loss per foot with RG6 its lower than RG59 RG6QS even lower and RG11 even lower
the common use of this is that with less loss per foot you can run it a longer distance
when you use RG11 in a place where RG59 could work then the loss is simpily so low because of the distance that its not currently enough to make a differance
and it is currently super overkill for 98% of cable runs
maybe in 10-20 years we'll get to the point that the loss on RG6QS is enough to cause a problem but at the same time in 20 years we might have left copper in the dust |
|
 rody_44Premium join:2004-02-20 Quakertown, PA 1 edit | reply to nate1234 no they wont use rg11, they should and probably will use qr320. much much better than rg11 and about the same diameter as rg11. rg11 is so old school these days. |
|