Wow, so why don't you tell us how you really feel. While you're at it, why don't you suggest a couple of viable options to actually fix some of the problems with our country's financial situation.
said by sonicmerlin:His arguments are *not* well-reasoned and worth consideration. You've simply avoided conflict by ignoring the *obvious* conflicts of interest and faulty logic, refusing to point them out for fear of insulting him.
Says the person that's added nothing tangible to the discussion. Don't worry, you aren't going to insult me.
said by sonicmerlin:What it boils down to is openbox wants the government to cut all programs that aid the poor while burdening the rich, and institute a flat tax across the board so rich people end up paying less.
And where did you pull that from. I've never once stated that, nor do I desire it.
said by sonicmerlin:He wholly favors the rich at the expense of the poor
Actually, I favor myself at the expense of everyone, but that's beside the point
said by sonicmerlin:were his ideas put into practice the already wide gap between rich and poor would increase to make the Grand Canyon seem like a crack in the floor.
How so?
said by sonicmerlin:Honestly he is so disagreeably biased I feel embarrassed to be living in the same country as him.
At least you have an unbiased open mind, otherwise this discussion might have decayed into name calling and pointless rambling.
said by sonicmerlin:It's people like him that screwed up our country over the last 8 years.
I beg your pardon. How exactly have I screwed up this country over the last eight years? Considering you don't know me, what I do, or what I've been doing for the last eight years, I find your comments a pointless rant.