<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Skybeam is totally the worst&#x27; in forum &#x27;&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Skybeam-is-totally-the-worst-22737885</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:21:18 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 21:21:18 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Skybeam is totally the worst</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Skybeam-is-totally-the-worst-22737885</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : When Mesa had it everything was great.  Since Skybeam took over I have daily outages, long hold times and over the past two weeks I've stopped being able to go to a lot of websites, msn.com as one of them.  I am a home based business so this is a huge problem for me.  Unfortunately, I have no options but wireless.  I never, never thought I would say this, but Skybeam is worst than Qwest in every way shape or form.  If you have other options, I HIGHLY recommend going with someone else.  You will not be happy with Skybeam.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Skybeam-is-totally-the-worst-22737885</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2009 15:32:37 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

