1 edit | reply to k1ll3rdr4g0n
Re: CEOs need better security said by k1ll3rdr4g0n:said by FHBroadband8:People shouldn't have to be pestered like that, no matter who they are. I feel bad for CEOs cause I know what they go through. Pies in the face, eggs, bullhorns, you name it. Doing things like that just sets yourself up for a criminal complaint and jail time. The the CEOs need jail time. At least a couple of hours of electroshock therapy because many of them (Time Warner's included) seem to live in a alternate reality where they think that they can charge insane prices for their services. Funny... Would you be saying this if you were a CEO and make one third of the money he is making? Wait... If you were you would not be here discussing the issue. You would be having a nice dinner at the company's expense planning how to trick yuor shareholders into giving you a raise.
Don't blame the man for being smart enough to convince the corporation to pay him more money in a year than most of us will ever see. Blame the consumers for being weak and falling for their propaganda and running to buy the newest technology not because is usefull or needed but because it is "cool". The reality is that if us the consumer don't change our cell phones every 6 months, don't get the "baddest" DVR and TV service that Verizon or other companies offer, there is no way they can make that much money.
The man is smart and convincing or he would not be the "CEO". |
|
|
|
| The consumers don't have perfect access to all information, including rates in other countries. They spend most of their time and energy focusing on other things, and shouldn't have to protect themselves from every company that wants to take advantage of them.
More importantly, these companies put themselves in near monopolistic positions. They try very hard to stamp out any competition, so they have a moral responsibility to their customers since their customers often have nowhere else to go. |
|
| said by sonicmerlin:The consumers don't have perfect access to all information, including rates in other countries. They spend most of their time and energy focusing on other things, and shouldn't have to protect themselves from every company that wants to take advantage of them. More importantly, these companies put themselves in near monopolistic positions. They try very hard to stamp out any competition, so they have a moral responsibility to their customers since their customers often have nowhere else to go. Regardless, don't blame the man for being able to convince others that his time is worth that much. Him as well as other CEO's were chosen to make money for the shareholders and is exactly what they are doing. I really doubt that they were chosen to sattisfy the consumer. Is not their fault that their strategies work. |
|
| said by dlr_graph:said by sonicmerlin:The consumers don't have perfect access to all information, including rates in other countries. They spend most of their time and energy focusing on other things, and shouldn't have to protect themselves from every company that wants to take advantage of them. More importantly, these companies put themselves in near monopolistic positions. They try very hard to stamp out any competition, so they have a moral responsibility to their customers since their customers often have nowhere else to go. Regardless, don't blame the man for being able to convince others that his time is worth that much. Him as well as other CEO's were chosen to make money for the shareholders and is exactly what they are doing. I really doubt that they were chosen to sattisfy the consumer. Is not their fault that their strategies work. *cough* Remember them? *cough*
Their strategy seems to be working well for them. |
|
