<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Microsoft Claim Transferred in SCO Suit&#x27; in forum &#x27;All Things Unix&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Microsoft-Claim-Transferred-in-SCO-Suit-22756037</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:55:11 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 19:55:11 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Microsoft Claim Transferred in SCO Suit</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Microsoft-Claim-Transferred-in-SCO-Suit-22764535</link>
<description><![CDATA[Steve posted : I have to admit: I'm completely lost. People transfer/sell claims all the time - maybe they want to be done with it, maybe they think they have a worse chance of collecting that the buying party, etc.<br><br>How is this meaningful?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Microsoft-Claim-Transferred-in-SCO-Suit-22764535</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 11:57:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>The LNS/York/Hale/Microsoft Smoking Gun</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-LNSYorkHaleMicrosoft-Smoking-Gun-22764220</link>
<description><![CDATA[SUMware posted : From <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090724113822181">Groklaw</a><br>July 24 2009 - <blockquote><small>quote:</small><hr>Both HaleGlobal and York Capital Management must be reading Groklaw. Joke. Joke. As in, is there a difference?<br><br>Anyway, right after Groklaw pointed out two days ago that Microsoft Licensing was transferring its claim against SCO in the bankruptcy to an entity called LNS, and that LNS seems to point to HaleGlobal/York Capital, the phone number on one of the links we provided has been changed.<br><br>Silly wabbits. You can't cleanse the Internet. This jig is up, m'hearties. Naturally, we took the precaution of saving snapshots, which I will now show you, along with some more interesting tidbits, like the same building address for LNS and Charles Hale, Managing Director at York Capital.<br><br>First, notice the address on the <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/SCOGBK-855.pdf">filing</a> [PDF] regarding Microsoft transferring its claim to LNS, captured in this screenshot: (<u>visit site for details</u>)<br><br>And in case Microsoft reads Groklaw: Shame on you, Microsoft. Seriously. If you knew, shame, shame, shame.<hr></blockquote>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/The-LNSYorkHaleMicrosoft-Smoking-Gun-22764220</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2009 10:26:57 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Microsoft Claim Transferred in SCO Suit</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Microsoft-Claim-Transferred-in-SCO-Suit-22756037</link>
<description><![CDATA[SUMware posted : From <A HREF="http://www.infoworld.com/t/platforms/microsoft-executive-lauds-open-source-499">Infoworld</a><br>July 19, 2006 -  <blockquote><small>said by Paul Krill :</small><hr>David Kaefer, director of Business Development, Intellectual Property and Licensing at Microsoft, said open source had bolstered innovation in a distributed fashion, and he called the open source software movement a "very powerful force in the industry."<hr></blockquote><br>This is the same <i>David Kaefer</i> that I note in the following Groklaw article.<br><br>From <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090721024349172">Groklaw</a><br>July 22 2009 -  <blockquote><small>said by Groklaw :</small><hr>So much is happening at once in the SCO bankruptcy. Novell has filed a <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/SCOGBK-858.pdf">Response</a> [PDF] to SCO's <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090708223757362">Notice of Cure Amounts</a>. Oracle has filed a <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/SCOGBK-849.pdf">limited objection</a> [PDF] to SCO's Notice of Cure Amounts and is sending in a lawyer [PDF]. IBM is adding yet another lawyer, <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/SCOGBK-859.pdf">Noah J. Phillips</a> [PDF]. Oracle has a claim listed on <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090708223757362">Exhibit A</a> [also <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20090711073420521">continued here</a>], but it says it has no clue what contract is involved.<br><br>Microsoft Licensing has <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/SCOGBK-855.pdf">transferred its $158,954 claim</a> [PDF] to a third party, LNS [<i>signed by David Kaefer for MS licensing</i>]. If Microsoft gets paid and Novell doesn't, I'd certainly like to know why.<br><br>Is Microsoft trying to transfer its claim to York? Why would it? And why would York want that claim? My brain is exploding. I honestly don't know what it all means, but it's too odd not to tell you about.<br><br>07/21/2009 - <A HREF="http://www.groklaw.net/pdf/SCOGBK-855.pdf">855</a> [PDF] - Transfer/Assignment of Claim. Transfer Agreement 3001 (e) 2 Transferor: Microsoft Licensing, Inc. To LNS LLC. Filed by LNS LLC. (Morris, Matthew) (Entered: 07/21/2009)<hr></blockquote>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Microsoft-Claim-Transferred-in-SCO-Suit-22756037</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2009 18:15:25 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

