| reply to Skyweir
Re: DIR-655 1.32 firmware - DNS relay issue (fixed) Skyweir, how can you have been running 1.32 six days when it was only released four days ago?
Are you a D-Link insider? |
|
 TsumePremium
join:2004-02-23
Johnson City, TN
 ·Comcast
| said by bananaman:Skyweir, how can you have been running 1.32 six days when it was only released four days ago? Are you a D-Link insider? This firmware is exactly the same file as the 1.32 3rd beta.
--
"Did you know that when one little panda pulls on another little panda's underwear, that's sexual harassment? That makes me a sa-a-a-a-ad panda." --Sexual Harassment Panda |
|
jsgiv
join:2009-03-01
Woodstock, GA | said by Tsume:said by bananaman:Skyweir, how can you have been running 1.32 six days when it was only released four days ago? Are you a D-Link insider? This firmware is exactly the same file as the 1.32 3rd beta. No - it's not - if you do a binary compare on the two files - you'll find that they're drastically different. |
|
1 edit | You are comparing the .bin files correct. Reason I ask is the beta zip has the beta disclaimer in it plus the readmes are different. So the zip files are different. |
|
jsgiv
join:2009-03-01
Woodstock, GA | said by dcurrey:You are comparing the .bin files correct. Reason I ask is the beta zip has the beta disclaimer in it plus the readmes are different. So the zip files are different. Yes - I compared .bin files - see the previous post.. |
|
1 edit | Your comparing the wrong files.
Latest beta is dir655_firmware_132b03NA_beta.zip 7-16-2009 |
|
jsgiv
join:2009-03-01
Woodstock, GA | said by dcurrey:Your comparing the wrong files. Latest beta is dir655_firmware_132b03NA_beta.zip 7-16-2009 I stand corrected..  - funny, that zip file wasn't in that directory the other day when I pulled it down. |
|
