site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
509
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


Uncle Paul

join:2003-02-04
USA
kudos:1

Doesn't ATT get it?

This is just the kind of thing that sets the stage for a battle on capital hill over neutrality and exclusivity.


ff1324
Everybody Goes Home
Premium
join:2002-08-24
On Four Day
Reviews:
·AT&T Southwest

Why? When you purchase an iPhone with service through AT&T, you agree to those terms. If you don't like the terms of the contract, don't purchase the product.

You have a choice as to which wireless carrier to use, which phone to purchase. Neutrality covers a broader concept as you don't have a choice which way your data is routed through other systems.
--
Remember the 2008 firefighters and police LODD's in St. Louis:
PO Ballman, Sgt. Biggs, FF Hummert, Sgt. King, FF Riggins... all murdered...RIP brothers.



Gbcue
Almost P.E.
Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to Uncle Paul

said by Uncle Paul:

This is just the kind of thing that sets the stage for a battle on capital hill over neutrality and exclusivity.
Nope, they don't understand. MLB streaming come to mind?
--
My BLOG!
Black Friday Ads

sonicmerlin

join:2009-05-24
Cleveland, OH
kudos:1

reply to ff1324
How many times does it have to be explained before you understand why wireless exclusivity is anti-competitive and a source of scrutiny from the FCC?

Phones and carriers are supposed to be separate to give consumers as much choice as possible. Carriers should compete on network service and price, phone manufacturers should compete on phone quality and price, and consumers should benefit from it all.

Yes, you don't *have* to buy anything. This is also true in China, where the communist government doesn't force a poor rural farmer to buy the latest phone with his life savings.


ross

join:2000-08-16

said by sonicmerlin:

How many times does it have to be explained before you understand why wireless exclusivity is anti-competitive and a source of scrutiny from the FCC?

Phones and carriers are supposed to be separate to give consumers as much choice as possible. Carriers should compete on network service and price, phone manufacturers should compete on phone quality and price, and consumers should benefit from it all.

Yes, you don't *have* to buy anything. This is also true in China, where the communist government doesn't force a poor rural farmer to buy the latest phone with his life savings.
You are trying to reason with a drone? Give it up already. Jeesh, doncha know better by now? That guy would rather march lockstep into Hell than deviate from the "program".

Saturday, 02-Jun 07:40:49 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics