Network Neutrality Redux > First Amendment does not apply to private property

reply to jaminus

Re: First Amendment does not apply to private property

"this should actually benefit the smaller carriers"

I can see the opposite for small providers like wISPs. Take someone like AT&T competing against a small wireless operator. It's no big deal for Ilec to increase capacity with little cost to themselves while the cost for a wISP to increase capacity is often very expensive. It's even worse when they have no choice to but to buy increased capacity from the iLEC.

That really doesn't have anything to do with neutrality. Neutrality isn't about one ISP having more capacity than another at all.

It is when you are a small op tying to serve customers with limited resources. If you are told you must allow something like P2P over a very limited resource a single P2P user can put you out of business.