republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
990
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


DJMASACRE

join:2008-05-27
Nepean, ON

wake up call.

If most users never reach the 250GB cap anyway. then why do they need the stupid caps at all then .

the few users who do go over that, no way should be affecting the network that much.

but if they are, atleast offer a 1TB cap or something higher with a higher price. simple. keep it simple.

caps can be a temporary solution, but not long term, lets be real.

This is a really good article and should be posted everwhere for north america to see.

wake up call .


nate1234

join:2008-08-21

I cant agree more.



DJMASACRE

join:2008-05-27
Nepean, ON

said by nate1234:

I cant agree more.
Thank you

( There is intelligent life still out here )

=80{P

nocannothave

join:2006-10-14
Kennewick, WA
Reviews:
·Charter

reply to DJMASACRE

said by DJMASACRE:

If most users never reach the 250GB cap anyway. then why do they need the stupid caps at all then .

the few users who do go over that, no way should be affecting the network that much.

but if they are, atleast offer a 1TB cap or something higher with a higher price. simple. keep it simple.

caps can be a temporary solution, but not long term, lets be real.

This is a really good article and should be posted everwhere for north america to see.

wake up call .
I said this when the caps were first rumored. It does not make any sense how 1 user out of 100 can be uploading at 1mb/s and ruin 99 other people's internet experience.


IPPlanMan
Holy Cable Modem Batman

join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1

Because the caps aren't about preserving the user experience... That's what the network management system is for...

The caps have another purpose all together: preventing alternative sources of video that compete with "OnDemand" like Vudu, iTunes/Apple TV, and NetFlix Streaming from taking hold.

See the "Bandwidth" sticky thread in the Comcast HSI forum: »The Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management Topic

Especially this post: »Re: Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here
--
"We're going to start at one end of (Fallujah), and we're not going to stop until we get to the other. If there's anybody left when that happens, we're going to turn around and we're going to go back and finish it."
Lt. Col. Pete Newell: 1st Inf. US Army



DJMASACRE

join:2008-05-27
Nepean, ON

reply to nocannothave

said by nocannothave:

said by DJMASACRE:

If most users never reach the 250GB cap anyway. then why do they need the stupid caps at all then .

the few users who do go over that, no way should be affecting the network that much.

but if they are, atleast offer a 1TB cap or something higher with a higher price. simple. keep it simple.

caps can be a temporary solution, but not long term, lets be real.

This is a really good article and should be posted everwhere for north america to see.

wake up call .
I said this when the caps were first rumored. It does not make any sense how 1 user out of 100 can be uploading at 1mb/s and ruin 99 other people's internet experience.
so believe me, that argument -- as incomplete as it is -- is still only just a tip of the iceberg, for the excuses that have been played by these Telcos. And we have dug deep to find out the real reasons these companies are doing what they are doing. Trust me, its not about congestion. It cant be. Fortunately, those " 1 our of 100 people " also have the intelligence and "geek" savvy to understand, quite cleary, this is complete FUCKING BULLSHIT

was I being vaguely brief and blunt enough on this ?

This has gone so much further than caps and congestion that I can almost taste my own puke stuck up into my throat.

This is how disgustingly obvious the reality within this mess actually is.

and all in all I have to only surrender to more pain towards the people that run this world =~(


Angelo
The Network Guy
Premium
join:2002-06-18

i hit 400gb a day does taht mean im a iso nut?



DJMASACRE

join:2008-05-27
Nepean, ON

said by Angelo:

i hit 400gb a day does taht mean im a iso nut?
nope, try harder

nocannothave

join:2006-10-14
Kennewick, WA
Reviews:
·Charter

reply to IPPlanMan

said by IPPlanMan:

Because the caps aren't about preserving the user experience... That's what the network management system is for...

The caps have another purpose all together: preventing alternative sources of video that compete with "OnDemand" like Vudu, iTunes/Apple TV, and NetFlix Streaming from taking hold.

See the "Bandwidth" sticky thread in the Comcast HSI forum: »The Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management Topic

Especially this post: »Re: Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here
Interesting. Thanks.


DJMASACRE

join:2008-05-27
Nepean, ON

said by nocannothave:

said by IPPlanMan:

Because the caps aren't about preserving the user experience... That's what the network management system is for...

The caps have another purpose all together: preventing alternative sources of video that compete with "OnDemand" like Vudu, iTunes/Apple TV, and NetFlix Streaming from taking hold.

See the "Bandwidth" sticky thread in the Comcast HSI forum: »The Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management Topic

Especially this post: »Re: Bandwidth Limits/Congestion Management - All discussion here
Interesting. Thanks.
theres another spoonful to take in like a mother needing to use the airplaine feeding method with her baby.


IPPlanMan
Holy Cable Modem Batman

join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1

Spoonful from me or from Comcast. Not sure what you are saying.



IPPlanMan
Holy Cable Modem Batman

join:2000-09-20
Washington, DC
kudos:1

reply to nocannothave
You are welcome. That thread is worth a read.


Saturday, 02-Jun 08:03:17 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics