 fcislerPremium
join:2004-06-14
Riverhead, NY | recent meeting I'm a little confused. Please correct me on anything here - i'm trying to get the high level overview.
There was the recent hearing/meeting about the throttling itself - is/was this a topic of that meeting? Has any result came out of this meeting/hearing?
As far as I understand (and I could be completely off) the hearing was for the THROTTLING ONLY and they have not came back with and results or determinations (yet?). Am I correct?
The CRTC never "approved" Bell applying the throttling to incumbents. Why now did the CRTC approve the UBB? Because it has to do with money?
What actual power does the CRTC hold? Should they have came out of this meeting and said "Bell - you are wrong - remove the throttling NOW" - would bell be compelled to remove the throttling? Does it have any other "chain of command" (so to speak) to follow?
Now that it's approved on an interim basis 1) When does it begin effect 2) How long will it remain in effect and 3) What who and how will determine if this is going to stay?
I think it would be a very good idea for someone who is well versed in this to put together some sort of time-line and non biased "recap" of all these issues starting with the throttling. By non biased I mean just present facts of "who dunnit!" and the times. In addition - it would be nice to see another document with a "blow by blow" to the time line as to what the effect is on each action and then documents supporting/disproving ideas and actions.
I don't think Bell is right at all here - but an unbiased time line stating facts - I think - would help a majority understand it - followed with a "more information link" to discuss what impact each action has.
My condolences to my neighbors to the north - it sounds like they are now charging YOU to bend over, extra for the lube AND per minute! |
