site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

dynodb
Premium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN

reply to RARPSL

Re: Refusal of the Money and its effect on Multi-Cable

said by RARPSL:

The fact that they are refusing the money should AUTOMATICALLY make any effort to block Muni-Cable illegal. IOW: By rejecting the money they should be ruled as having no standing to go to court to block any Municipality that wants to set up their own system.
Huh? That they're refusing taxpayer money means they can't make the case that they shouldn't have to compete against taxpayer-funded municipal offerings that can use tax money to operate at a loss?


anon10char

@suddenlink.net

they routinely block municipals on the basis that they plan to and are going to serve these areas in the future.


dynodb
Premium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN

said by anon10char :

they routinely block municipals on the basis that they plan to and are going to serve these areas in the future.
And they can't do that without government money? In most cases, they're already serving those areas to some extent.

Saturday, 02-Jun 08:31:21 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics