 DaSneaky1Done wall to block them allPremium,MVM
join:2001-03-29
The Lou
 ·Charter
| reply to djrobx
Re: Lame and lamer ... It's not lame if you think of it from this perspective...
Over the life of a 3G-S iPhone, a customer is expected to pay for the price of the phone plus a monthly service charge. If someone delayed the purchase of that phone until they felt it was "worth the investment" (that worth being justified by what has been advertised and marketed), then this customer is not being provided the expected service.
Breaking the contract would cause an unexpected hardship on the customer because their intent is to spend a defined monthly amount for the service...not extra due to services not being provided by the faulting party.
This is more than simply a customer that wants to send MMS messages. This is about people spending hard earned money and are being possibly disregarded by two corporations though alleged deception.
There is certainly basis for this suit, until the judge finds otherwise. |
