 funchordsHelloPremium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5
1 edit | reply to funchords
Re: When Was Comcast Punished? (replying to my own message)
Further, Comcast was, in effect, REWARDED.
Comcast had announced that they already were planning to stop using Sandvine RSTs by year's end and that they'd switch to a protocol-agnostic method.
The FCC gave Comcast license to continue using its interference-causing device for the remainder of 2008 and to switch to its new method as planned. Comcast was required to disclose, finally, what they were doing -- more a punishment for lying than a punishment for non-NN.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- District of Columbia -- KJ7RL
Evil does seek to maintain power by suppressing the truth, or by misleading the innocent. --Spock and McCoy stardate 5029.5 |
|
brad
join:2007-09-06
Etobicoke, ON | said by funchords:Comcast had announced that they already were planning to stop using Sandvine by year's end and that they'd switch to a protocol-agnostic method. They haven't stopped using Sandvine equipment. |
|
funchordsHelloPremium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5 | said by brad:They haven't stopped using Sandvine equipment. You are correct. I should have said Sandvine RSTs. |
|
