dalziell
join:2009-08-16
Port Orchard, WA
1 edit | Anyone Having problems in Port Orchard?
For at least the last week my internet cable service has been barely usable in the evenings. I have the 6mbps service, but starting around 7 pm, I'm lucky to get 1mbps. I called technical support and suggested it was a usage problem because my connection is fine during the day, but they insisted that there were no usage problems in Port Orchard. Is anyone else having problems in Port Orchard?
 |
|
drew
Reformation
Premium
join:2002-07-10
Port Orchard, WA
clubs: | I haven't gotten above 1-1.5 mbps in months. |
|
gtojim
join:2002-03-18
Concord, CA
 ·VOIPo
| I'm not in your area, tonight from Concord Ca |
|
AD7BK
Premium
join:2000-03-23
Port Orchard, WA
 ·wavebroadband
| reply to dalziell
They are messing with the system perhaps. Installing the 18MB service. They need to fix it internet slowed down to a crawl and kills my voip programs
--
The following statement is true...
The preceding statement was false!!--George Carlin |
|
dalziell
join:2009-08-16
Port Orchard, WA
| reply to dalziell
Techs were just here and said everything was fine. Of course everything is fine now since I only have problems in the evening. 
They keep on insisting I'm the only one in Port Orchard with speed issues. |
|
gtojim
join:2002-03-18
Concord, CA
·VOIPo
1 edit | I've also been told I'm the only one having issues.
Like you techs come during the day and never find a problem. It's the evening hours when everyone gets home from work that things slow down.
I will admit things are better, my ping times are much lower than they used to be. |
|
AD7BK
Premium
join:2000-03-23
Port Orchard, WA
·wavebroadband
| reply to dalziell
I am too they lie they know they have issues they are to egotistical to admit to their mistakes I say everyone in Port Orchard go to their cable store with their modem stating IF YOU GUYS DONT ADMIT TO YOUR MISTAKE OF NOT ADMITING THERE IS ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE SERVICE WE ARE GOING TO COMCAST
Oh I bet they will belly up to the bar and admit it. They been having issues SINCE they rolled out 18/2 service. The idiots did not test all they cared about is profits not us the endusers |
|
Badluckguy
join:2001-02-07
Silverdale, WA | reply to dalziell
They changed my route to the net today. My 3rd hop is now different and now have massive lag and timeouts. |
|
Badluckguy
join:2001-02-07
Silverdale, WA
| reply to dalziell
Here's a trace from a few minutes ago... Been like this all afternoon...
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms unknown [192.168.1.1]
2 17 ms 18 ms 16 ms 24-113-54-1.wavecable.com [24.113.54.1]
3 11 ms 14 ms 9 ms 24-113-127-41.wavecable.com [24.113.127.41]
4 249 ms 248 ms 246 ms 64.146.249.93
5 285 ms 270 ms 298 ms xe-3-0-0-103.sea11.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.133]
6 350 ms 331 ms 361 ms xe-1-0-0.nyc20.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.185.45]
7 339 ms 332 ms 325 ms netaccess-gw.ip4.tinet.net [213.200.66.202]
8 338 ms 342 ms 339 ms 0.e1-3.tbr2.tl9.nac.net [209.123.10.74]
9 351 ms 345 ms 347 ms 0.e1-4.tbr2.mmu.nac.net [209.123.10.77]
10 352 ms 356 ms 356 ms 0.e1-1.tbr2.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.21]
11 358 ms 359 ms 358 ms vlan808.esd1.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.42]
12 342 ms 351 ms 345 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Trace complete. |
|
PO_anon
@wavecable.com
| Sunday 9:30
no problem here
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms 192.168.1.1
2 10 ms 10 ms 7 ms 24-113-66-1.wavecable.com [24.113.66.1]
3 12 ms 10 ms 9 ms 24-113-127-41.wavecable.com [24.113.127.41]
4 15 ms 13 ms 16 ms 64.146.249.93
5 16 ms 11 ms 13 ms xe-3-0-0-103.sea11.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.133]
6 89 ms 90 ms 88 ms xe-2-0-0.nyc20.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.185.82]
7 89 ms 89 ms 90 ms netaccess-gw.ip4.tinet.net [213.200.66.202]
8 91 ms 94 ms 88 ms 0.e1-4.tbr2.mmu.nac.net [209.123.10.77]
9 95 ms 90 ms 90 ms 0.e1-1.tbr2.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.21]
10 95 ms 91 ms 99 ms gi7-16.esd1.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.222]
11 96 ms 97 ms 91 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175] |
|
chpalmer
join:2002-11-18
Belfair, WA
·wavebroadband
·VOIPo
1 edit | reply to dalziell
C:\WINDOWS\system32>tracert dslreports.com
Tracing route to dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms firebox.airsignal.org [172.31.125.1]
2 12 ms 9 ms 10 ms 24.113.35.1
3 11 ms 9 ms 10 ms 24-113-127-41.wavecable.com [24.113.127.41]
4 11 ms 11 ms 14 ms 64.146.249.93
5 12 ms 11 ms 12 ms xe-3-0-0-103.sea11.ip4.tinet.net [77.67.70.133]
6 89 ms 87 ms 85 ms xe-1-0-0.nyc20.ip4.tinet.net [89.149.185.45]
7 89 ms 87 ms 88 ms netaccess-gw.ip4.tinet.net [213.200.73.122]
8 89 ms 89 ms 89 ms 0.e1-4.tbr2.mmu.nac.net [209.123.10.77]
9 89 ms 90 ms 88 ms 0.e1-1.tbr2.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.21]
10 89 ms 89 ms 89 ms gi7-16.esd1.oct.nac.net [209.123.10.222]
11 94 ms 90 ms 89 ms www.dslreports.com [209.123.109.175]
Trace complete.
Tracing route to dslnuts.com [74.0.62.14]
over a maximum of 30 hops:
1 1 ms 1 ms 1 ms firebox.airsignal.org [172.31.125.1]
2 11 ms 10 ms 10 ms 24.113.35.1
3 12 ms 10 ms 8 ms 24-113-127-41.wavecable.com [24.113.127.41]
4 11 ms 11 ms 13 ms wavebroadband-gw.g11-0.oly-cor0.noanet.net [64.146.232.253]
5 14 ms 13 ms 15 ms srp3-0.wtn-cor0.noanet.net [66.119.192.25]
6 15 ms 198 ms 211 ms ge-6-20.car3.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.71.152.141]
7 14 ms 15 ms 18 ms ae-31-51.ebr1.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.68.105.30]
8 23 ms 17 ms 20 ms ae-1-100.ebr2.Seattle1.Level3.net [4.69.132.18]
9 50 ms 53 ms 53 ms ae-2.ebr2.Denver1.Level3.net [4.69.132.54]
10 65 ms 63 ms 64 ms ae-3.ebr1.Chicago2.Level3.net [4.69.132.62]
11 74 ms 71 ms 73 ms ae-6.ebr1.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.69.140.189]
12 65 ms 64 ms 61 ms ae-12-53.car2.Chicago1.Level3.net [4.68.101.67]
13 66 ms 64 ms 62 ms COVAD.car2.Chicago1.Level3.net [63.210.100.198]
14 * * * Request timed out.
15 * * * Request timed out.
16 102 ms 79 ms 79 ms h-74-0-62-14-static.chcgilgm.covad.net [74.0.62.14]
Trace complete.
Interesting... |
|
chpalmer
join:2002-11-18
Belfair, WA | 64.146.249.93 - is noanet
Looks like they are adding capacity. |
|
Badluckguy
join:2001-02-07
Silverdale, WA | reply to dalziell
Must be having some growing pains then... |
|
