So help me out here... your argument is that every company who wants to put up a website must "contribute to infrastructure" above and beyond what they already pay their own ISP, preferably by building their own damn network?
That most definitely is not my argument nor what I wrote. Google does much more than "put up a website" btw. They are very adamant and outspoken as to how other companies should run their networks. There has been much buzz that Google was interested in being an ISP, so much so that they've invested minimal amounts of money to do so to save face imo. If they truly want a utopian and open network, then they should get serious about it, otherwise Google is simply pawing (that's not necessarily a bad thing btw) at the incumbent ISPs like everyone else.
I've never stated I'm against network neutrality? I have stated that there's no reason to overly regulate the ISPs at this point in time. Watchful eyes with occasional hand slaps have worked nicely and will continue to do so imo.
·