http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22908767 en Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:40:04 EDT Wed, 10 Feb 2010 02:40:04 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22913283 ezatnova : 88 and 3074 are definitely forwarded. But I am also forwarding a boatload of others that I have found via the google.

Don't understand the double NAT statement, or public IP??]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22913283 Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:21:58 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22911915 Napsterbater : Are you on Verizon FIOS? There is a deicated froum to FIOS here (»Verizon Fiber Optics).

In theory you should have open NAT if there is no double NAT (If you have a public IP on the Actiontech WAN this is not the case), have you tried forwarding just ports 88 UDP and 3074 TCP and UDP?
--
AMD Phenom II x3 720 BE @ 3.5Ghz(OC) | 4Gb Memory @ 1600mhz | Sapphire ATI HD4870 1GB 800mhz/1000mhz(OC) | 2x500GB HDD's Raid 0 | Windows 7 Ultimate x64 Build 7100]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22911915 Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:51:45 EDT http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22908767 ezatnova : Does it make any sense that my Xbox Live test still comes up with a Moderate (not Open) NAT setting, even after I set the Xbox's (static) IP on the Actiontech router to DMZ? I thought this would be a foolproof way to get an Open NAT test result??

Thanks]]> http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22908767 Sat, 22 Aug 2009 14:56:33 EDT