<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;TKIP still not broken&#x27; in forum &#x27;Wireless Security&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/TKIP-still-not-broken-22935239</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:08:33 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:08:33 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: TKIP still not broken</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22937489</link>
<description><![CDATA[hurleyp posted : SANS has posted a link to the paper in question:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://jwis2009.nsysu.edu.tw/location/paper/A%20Practical%20Message%20Falsification%20Attack%20on%20WPA.pdf" >jwis2009.nsysu.edu.tw/location/p&middot;&middot;&middot;0WPA.pdf</A><br><br>Broken or not, it seems that TKIP will fall soon. Prolly a good idea to switch to WPA with AES or WPA2, if your router supports it.<br><small>--<br>"I reject your reality and substitute my own."</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22937489</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:17:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TKIP still not broken</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22936442</link>
<description><![CDATA[DataRiker posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1541809" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1541809');">docrice</a>:</small><br><br>Is this what you're referring to?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/082709-new-attack-cracks-common-wi-fi.html" >www.networkworld.com/news/2009/0&middot;&middot;&middot;-fi.html</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://jwis2009.nsysu.edu.tw/location/paper/A%20Practical%20Message%20Falsification%20Attack%20on%20WPA.pdf" >jwis2009.nsysu.edu.tw/location/p&middot;&middot;&middot;0WPA.pdf</A><br> </div>Yes, but more specifically the new headline on this site:<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="/shownews/Japanese-Computer-Scientists-Crack-WPA-104155">Japanese Computer Scientists Crack WPA</A><br><br>The comments are already full of dire remarks and claims of "easy wpa cracking" ( all of which are wrong on all counts )<br><br>WPA-PSK is still as secure as it ever was. Brute force is still the only way to recover PSK key.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22936442</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:50:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TKIP still not broken</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22936375</link>
<description><![CDATA[DataRiker posted : <div class="bquote"><small>said by <a href="/profile/1070900" onClick="this.blur(); return popup(event,'/uidpop?ajh=1&uid=1070900');">nwrickert</a>:</small><br><br>I am taking a "wait and see" attitude at present.  Some of the headlines seem overstated.  But information is still a bit scant.<br> </div>Overstated is an understatement. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22936375</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 23:35:16 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TKIP still not broken</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22935564</link>
<description><![CDATA[nwrickert posted : I am taking a "wait and see" attitude at present.  Some of the headlines seem overstated.  But information is still a bit scant.<br><small>--<br>AT&T dsl; Speedstream 5100b modem; Zyxel NBG334W router;  openSuSE 11.0; firefox 3.0.13</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22935564</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:48:55 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: TKIP still not broken</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22935502</link>
<description><![CDATA[docrice posted : Is this what you're referring to?<br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://www.networkworld.com/news/2009/082709-new-attack-cracks-common-wi-fi.html" >www.networkworld.com/news/2009/0&middot;&middot;&middot;-fi.html</A><br><br>&raquo;<A HREF="http://jwis2009.nsysu.edu.tw/location/paper/A%20Practical%20Message%20Falsification%20Attack%20on%20WPA.pdf" >jwis2009.nsysu.edu.tw/location/p&middot;&middot;&middot;0WPA.pdf</A>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-TKIP-still-not-broken-22935502</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 20:34:50 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>TKIP still not broken</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/TKIP-still-not-broken-22935239</link>
<description><![CDATA[DataRiker posted : I just wanted to point out something, since the front page headlines are a bit misleading.<br><br>There is still no know flaw in the WPA cipher, and the new exploit does not allow recovery of the key, but rather under an almost impossible circumstance allows injection of packets.<br><br>Just thought I would add that before people start to compare it to the WEP cipher which is busted ( well its application is, the actual cipher is sound )]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/TKIP-still-not-broken-22935239</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:48:49 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

