| reply to pnh102
Re: Countersue said by pnh102:Apple and AT&T should countersue these plaintiffs into oblivion. As both companies made it clear that MMS was not available, there should be no grounds for any suit. How did they make it so clear that everybody that owns an iPhone capable of MMS was aware that MMS was not currently available?
Please explain? I hope you don't pin your response on a keynote address that the Apple God gave 3 months ago. Because I am sure that every iPhone customer was sitting around listening to the Holy One speak.
--
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots" |
|
| The holy one didn't give the speech... |
|
fiberguyMy views are my own.Premium
join:2005-05-20
kudos:3 | reply to kfsutops
apple stated that the 3.0 software would be capable of sending MMS.. they did not speak for ATT. As of today, apples' claim has been true as the 3.0 can send a picture message.
The ones that really DO need to have their asses kicked is ATT, not apple. |
|
|
|
| said by fiberguy:apple stated that the 3.0 software would be capable of sending MMS.. they did not speak for ATT. As of today, apples' claim has been true as the 3.0 can send a picture message. The ones that really DO need to have their asses kicked is ATT, not apple. I agree that AT&T is the one responsible. It's not Apple. But to assume that everybody who owns and iPhone is aware of MMS not being available is nuts.
The only announcement was at the keynote. Basically very few people sit around and watch the speech made during the introduction of the iPhone. But all of the advertising shows MSM feature being available. I actually believe Apple had a commercial where someone was obviously using MMS because they were sending a picture through the text messaging feature.
I for one hope AT&T gets slammed to the wall for this. AT&T is one shitty ass company and should be sued at every opportunity.
--
"There are no stupid questions, but there are a LOT of inquisitive idiots" |
|
