T4K
join:2002-03-13
Roach, MO | Low latency satellite? I'd like to see that. |
|
|
|
 DrModemPremium
join:2006-10-19
USA
kudos:1 | said by T4K:I'd like to see that. Too bad it's impossible |
|
 BF69Premium
join:2004-07-28
Camden, TN | reply to T4K
said by T4K:I'd like to see that. Well when you can increase the speed of light let us know. |
|
| reply to DrModem
said by DrModem:said by T4K:I'd like to see that. Too bad it's impossible How about using LEO's for lower latency satellite?
It won't match a wired connection but it will be better than current sats. |
|
lesopp
join:2001-06-27
Land O Lakes, FL | That would reduce latency but since it would require many more satellites increase the cost. Think of it in terms of replacing a couple of geosynchronous satellites with an array similar in design and orbital mechanics to GPS satellites. |
|
| reply to DrModem
Perfectly possible.
We just need to force the government to take faster-than-light communications technology out of hiding and into the public domain.
You know they have it. It was stolen from the space-craft studied at Area 51, years ago.
Obama has it in his Blackberry. I read about it on the internet. |
|
 wow
@minetfiber.net | Is that for real? |
|
