 DavidNow accepting new patientsPremium,VIP
join:2002-05-30
Granite City, IL
kudos:70
 ·AT&T Southwest
 ·DIRECTV
·AT&T Midwest
 ·Google Voice
| I agree. said by iansltx:Call me a corporate communist, but that's setting the bar too high at this point. Once we can get low-latency 3 Mbps down, 768k up service to 95% of the US via at least two methods of broadband service, then we can work on 5 Mbps symmetric. said by Duramax08:I agree, Its way to high for something reasonable. I would say 1.5 mbps up and down should be something to aim at. But anything faster then dial up is broadband for me. said by Romney2012:5 mbps upstream would make DSL and all wireless unable to be called broadband. The FCC will NEVER adopt what Free Press wants. I agree with all you guys, it's about 1/2 the reason (I think) we don't sell a 192-384/128-384 profile anymore. I still get about 1-2 a week that wished they could just try a 768/384 tier. Nope- Can't sync at the crossbox or just too far for reliable service.
--
If you have a topic in the direct forum please reply to it or a post of mine, I get a notification when you do this.
Koetting Ford, Granite City, illinois... YOU'RE FIRED!!
|
