site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
406
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


howtodoit

@verizon.net

how would you stay online?

If you are on a moving train, wouldn't a wifi signal continuously drop out and need to renegotiate every time you pass an access point? Or is this mainly for just the stations when you might be stationary?

EPS

join:2008-02-13
Hingham, MA

That's what I was wondering- MBTA Commuter Rail has Wi-Fi, (free to everyone, even) but it's provided by at&t (which defaced the carriages with its horrifyingly terrible logo and orange), which has a cellular network and so the Wi-Fi is provided by routers in each carriage... something like this would seem to make more sense.



NickD
Premium
join:2000-11-17
Princeton Junction, NJ

AT&T can do it at a low cost because it owns the cellular network. Cablevision only owns cable lines, and it's pretty hard to connect a cable line to a moving train.



fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

said by NickD:

AT&T can do it at a low cost because it owns the cellular network. Cablevision only owns cable lines, and it's pretty hard to connect a cable line to a moving train.
It can be done wirelessly with repeaters on the poles.

Remember metricom ricochet? They used transmitters on utility poles.

Friday, 01-Jun 13:05:29 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics