jbs
join:2005-01-09
Birmingham, AL | reply to jbs
Re: Does IPKall direct to ATA make a difference? Thanks. Last night I checked my ip and changed my IPKall information. setting the proxy to ipnumber:5060. I set my ata to make and answer without reg. This morning the phone rang, but I couldn't answer it at all, much less experience one way audio.
There must be some other things I need to set on my ata. I haven't had a stun server enabled before, but after doing so I still get nothing.
This is promising if I can get it to work! |
|
NghtShd
join:2004-02-07
Bethlehem, GA | I believe the SPA2102R has 2 FXS ports. If so, does this problem occur on both ports? Do you have separate user ID settings for each port and was the phone you tried to answer on a port with a user ID matching the SIP Phone Number setting from IPKall? |
|
Reviews:
 ·Future Nine Corp..
| reply to jbs
You are experiencing one of the big problems that can be encountered using direct ip calling. The problem is NAT transversal. The problem is caused by the router that you are using. When you use an voip provider they often have several techniques available to avoid the problem. Just using your ata, you only use the techniques built into the ata. Using a STUN server along with the NAT Support Parameters usually solves the problem, not not always.
Dogface05 had a recent posting outline the best settings for NAT transversal on a Linksys/Cisco adapter.
»Re: Different providers for inbound and outbound on same ATA? |
|
| reply to jbs
Do you possibly have a port conflict? Is 5060 being used by another VoIP device? Try moving it to 5082 or some other port.
--
The difference between genius and stupidity is that genius has its limits. |
|
