<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Please recommend a very good wireless router in Wireless Networking</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/r22985858</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:57:58 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 19:57:58 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22996839</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1394292"><b>stevech0</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by watchin  :</small><br><br>I would suggest that both your router and remote adaptor be made by the same company for the most reliable results. <br> </div>Since 11n is a draft standard, still in flux, even same-vendor products of different vintages (age) can fail to interoperate with the advanced features of 11n, dropping back to a least common denominator. The channel-pair-bonding *negotiated option* in 11n, where you may attempt use of 2/3 of the entire 2.4GHz band, is the only new option that is a really dramatic improvement over 11g. This double-wide option is disabled in many products if there are vulnerable 11g systems nearby.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22996839</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 14:55:43 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22993902</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/0"><b>anon</b></A> :  :)is in 'draft' mode does not make it inherently "flaky". My 11n is not flaky, my previous 11g was not flaky. <br>I would suggest that both your router and remote adaptor be made by the same company for the most reliable results. <br>I have gone with TRENDnet and it works for me. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22993902</guid>
<pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2009 00:20:20 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22993763</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1109005"><b>tipstir</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  okj <A HREF="/useremail/u/466644"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>I think my Linksys Wireless G WRT54GS is finally on it's last leg.  I want to go with a new Wireless N (as I understand they are faster).  I also understand I must do some other things for the Wireless N to be effective (faster).<br><br>Can you recommend a high quality, reputable "N" router, and advise me as to what else I must do for it to work best?<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>GREAT forum, btw.<br> </div>Only faster by 120mbps than G 30mbps but you'll only see the difference on the LAN. Unless your WAN is more like 40mbps then N would be a bit better than G.  Remember G is stable than N. Right now N is flaky it can run lower that G sometimes.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22993763</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 23:46:36 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22993466</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1394292"><b>stevech0</b></A> : Remember that 11n has a myrid of options such as kinds of MIMO, channel bonding, bursting, and so on. These are negotiated between node pairs at run time. So vendor A and vendor B might wind up negotiating a least-common-denominator feature set not much better than 11g.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22993466</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 22:39:22 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22992260</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/566298"><b>PeteC2</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  Eat Me <A HREF="/useremail/u/693768"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br><div class="bquote"><small>said by  PeteC2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/566298"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A>  :</small><br><br>At some point the increased through-put of 11n will become more important, but for most folks, not yet.  Most people do not have ISPs that would even begin to stress 11g.<br> </div>Actually the proliferation of media devices in the home using your home network makes N worthwhile for a lot of people.  For example, TiVo desktop on my laptop using 11b or even 11g is painful. Most times I just jack in to any of the available ethernet jacks littered throughout my house.  For this reason alone I am thinking of going to 11n.  <br> </div>Yep, as I had already mentioned:<br><br><i>Where 11n routers can make an impact, is if one does a fair amount of file/data transfers within one's network, between computers, NAS, etc. </i><br><br>At this time intra-network transfer is where 11n may be a worthwhile option.  If not for that, I would not yet have switched from 11g<br><small>--<br>Deeds, not words</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22992260</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 18:53:51 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22990957</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/693768"><b>Eat Me</b></A> : <div class="bquote"><small>said by  PeteC2 <A HREF="/useremail/u/566298"><IMG SRC="http://i.dslr.net/bb/profile.gif" ALT="See Profile" BORDER=0 WIDTH=16 HEIGHT=11></A> :</small><br><br>At some point the increased through-put of 11n will become more important, but for most folks, not yet.  Most people do not have ISPs that would even begin to stress 11g.<br> </div>Actually the proliferation of media devices in the home using your home network makes N worthwhile for a lot of people.  For example, TiVo desktop on my laptop using 11b or even 11g is painful. Most times I just jack in to any of the available ethernet jacks littered throughout my house.  For this reason alone I am thinking of going to 11n.  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22990957</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 14:45:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22988569</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1394292"><b>stevech0</b></A> : <br>some non-geeks among us fail to realize that the laptops and PCs all have to be 11n, and compatable 11n, since 11n is still in draft status as an interoperable standard.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22988569</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2009 01:23:21 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22987850</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/566298"><b>PeteC2</b></A> : At some point the increased through-put of 11n will become more important, but for most folks, not yet.  Most people do not have ISPs that would even begin to stress 11g.<br><br>Where 11n routers can make an impact, is if one does a fair amount of file/data transfers within one's network, between computers, NAS, etc.  Even then, factors such as what devices you are running makes an impact.  Mixed 11g/11n networks run very close in speed to being just 11g.<br><br>An exception to that would be a 11n <i>simultaneous dual band</i> router, where you can run your 11n stuff on one band and your 11g on the other.  Of course, these routers will run on the higher end of the price range.<br><br>Generally, routers do not wear out/wear down.  They can completely crap-out of course, but stevech0's observation is more likely the case.  <br><br>I have a Linksys 610N and am very satisfied with it, with two caveats:  1.  It <i>is</i> pricey!  2.  It has a USB drive connector that works, but is really not an ideal solution...a dedicated NAS is a much better route for network storage.  Having said that, it has gigabit connectivity, simultaneous dual-band, and for me, it has been absolutely rock-solid from day one.<br><br>Having said that:  <i>Every consumer router has a complete mix of success/mediocre/and downright bad reviews!</i><br><small>--<br>Deeds, not words</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22987850</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 20:56:40 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22987512</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/1394292"><b>stevech0</b></A> : rarely do these devices "wear out" and go to their "Last Leg".<br>What can happen is interference which will affect any proudct you choose. There are ways to overcome interference. But that may not be your situation.<br><br>Read the FAQ here on - should I buy an 11n router. ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22987512</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 19:41:02 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Please recommend a very good wireless router</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22985858</link>
<description><![CDATA[<A HREF="/useremail/u/466644"><b>okj</b></A> : I think my Linksys Wireless G WRT54GS is finally on it's last leg.  I want to go with a new Wireless N (as I understand they are faster).  I also understand I must do some other things for the Wireless N to be effective (faster).<br><br>Can you recommend a high quality, reputable "N" router, and advise me as to what else I must do for it to work best?<br><br>Thanks!<br><br>GREAT forum, btw.]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/remark,22985858</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 12:48:47 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>
