site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


r81984
Fair and Balanced
Premium
join:2001-11-14
Katy, TX
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse
·AT&T DSL Service
·row44

reply to Matt

Re: Pfft

said by Matt:

said by r81984:

Not when people call scammy Iowa conference call numbers and ATT and Verizon get billed $.06 a minute.
Right, that's the problem! Everyone needs to stop using FreeConferenceCall and we'll all get lower cell phones bills!

Of course, AT&T charges you $0.10 a minute for the same service, but that's ok, right? »businessesales.att.com/products/···ng.jhtml
What is wrong with charging the user anything???
With the scammy Iowa conference numbers instead of the user getting charged the phone company does. Why should the phone company pay for your conference calls???
--
Democrats are not Socialists any more than Republicans are.


Matt
All noise, no signal.
Premium
join:2003-07-20
Jamestown, NC
kudos:12

said by r81984:

said by Matt:

said by r81984:

Not when people call scammy Iowa conference call numbers and ATT and Verizon get billed $.06 a minute.
Right, that's the problem! Everyone needs to stop using FreeConferenceCall and we'll all get lower cell phones bills!

Of course, AT&T charges you $0.10 a minute for the same service, but that's ok, right? »businessesales.att.com/products/···ng.jhtml
What is wrong with charging the user anything???
With the scammy Iowa conference numbers instead of the user getting charged the phone company does. Why should the phone company pay for your conference calls???
And the charges are passed along in the form of some bogus fee I'm sure. I'm sorry, I'm not going to cry a river for an ILEC ... especially not over $0.06 a minute.

Sunday, 03-Jun 06:59:55 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics