 | reply to R0CKY
Re: TSI R&V and Stay for UBB now in.... Like an incumbent did is the key. Today, Bell has no ROI guarantee. Before, during the regulated era, Bell got to adjust it's prices based on the return threshold that was set. If they became more efficient, the price went down. It they got less efficient, the price went up. Today, the price is what the market will bear, with a floor to prevent them from undercutting competitors. |
|
 | So since they're operating two services, one regulated, one somewhat unregulated, over largely the same infrastructure, should we assume that they still stiff us for 100% of the shared infrastructure costs through the regulated services?
I don't think Bell has come clean in terms of how much of their internet (and cell?) stuff is running through/on their legacy rights of way, copper plant, backbone, easements, COs, etc. but paid for through regulated services (local tel mainly). If Bell is going to start using these spaces for non-tariffed products, they should have to "sell" or "lease" it to these other divisions, and pay us back with the proceeds (how to come up with a price is another story).
1970s: CO 100% utilized for local phone service - All CO expenses recovered through local phone tariffs 1980s/1990s: COs digitized, CO now half empty - All CO expenses recovered through local phone tariffs Today: CO 1/2 local phone, 1/2 free-market IP services - All CO expenses still recovered through local phone tariffs? |
|
 1 edit | reply to R0CKY I'll say it and im like most of you , NO WAY IN HELL am i EVER going back to bell canada as a ISP PERIOD id rather UGH OMG ALMOST as BAD go to rogers befor ei EVER did that
AND 72 is a legal smack at both bell canada and CRTC who should no better then allow these kinds of things to occure in 1st place.
As the saying goes
YOU CANNOT PLEAD IGNORANCE UNDER THE LAW
and that my dear friends is what they are trying and this is where the whole has some real teeth in giving a supreme court case or multiple ones in TSI's favor of legal case law.
In effect if CRTC upholds it TSI could really really slap both of these two in court. |
|
 | reply to An_Onymous said by An_Onymous :
>The only other way to take advantage of existing 'last mile' wiring is to use the power lines - which go into every premises - even those that don't have telco/cableco wiring.
As an utility provider, they already have their own poles or conduits and right of way access to install new ones, so that save the years having to fight the red tape for installations. In Toronto, you don't typically see fiber or copper telco/cableco wiring on the same poles as electricity. |
|
 | reply to Jaser Since you'll need at least the dry pair or a working POTS line to have DSL, the cost of the copper wire outside of the CO/Remote is covered.
Now $20 is *A LOT* just to cover the DSLAM rental and use of Bell's internal network for my packets. TSI pays for the network connections on those GiE links on the rest of that trip to Front Street . |
|
 Omr join:2004-01-10 M1S-1B3 | reply to R0CKY I think they use the same poles but think of it as a tree line in a rainforest. The higher up is the electrical lines, the ones that are about standard ladder height or lower are the telco lines. The reason is that Telecom service engineer or for any other citizen it's harder for them to reach hot lines ... but the electrical worker from the utilities can bring there cranes and reach the hot lines.
Fiber can run along the electrical lines without interference effecting it, but it runs on the lower levels because of that safety hazard. |
|
 | reply to jfmezei said by jfmezei:Don't forget that the government is under the mistaken impression that mobile phones provide competitive brodband service. Considering that the current cell infrastructure is owned by the same companies as the wired infrastructure, there really isn't any competition to speak of... that much should be painfully obvious to anyone capable of rational thought.
said by jfmezei:This makes it easier for them to aloow Bell do do what it wants with its legacy copper. If I had my own FTTH/EFM network, Bell could file a tariff to charge $100/ft/month to lease copper loops and I would love it: more people fleeing copper loops = larger potential subscriber pool for glass-based connectivity. |
|
|
|
 CanerisErikCanerisPremium,VIP join:2007-10-03 Toronto, ON kudos:2 | reply to MaynardKrebs said by MaynardKrebs:In Toronto, you don't typically see fiber or copper telco/cableco wiring on the same poles as electricity. Huh? You see it everywhere in Toronto, and not in Toronto, on the same poles as electricity. -- Erik - Caneris Inc. |
|
 Reviews:
·odynet
| in my area a Victorian neighbourhood near downtown London pretty much everything is overhead wiring. Cable TV and Phone are fed from a mix of Hydro poles and scary looking legacy Bell poles running down the rear of some properties.
Recently Rogers was complaining about the unfair rates London Hydro charges them for pole use IIRC it was somewhere around $22 per annum per pole. I can only assume from this that Bell gets a better deal.
As for the height of communications cable run on Hydro poles IIRC the Code requires them to be a minimum of 6 feet below the lowest electrical conductor.
Vomio |
|
 | reply to R0CKY cant be 22$ a pole go count the number of poles on a street do the electrical, the out sourced indians costs and the fat CEO checks Naaa can't be that rogers is wanting to lower prices to SQUASH bell should they get this UUB stuff ...eh? |
|
 | reply to R0CKY ok ok ok and I wont even bother reading through all these posts yet,
and thank you thank you thank you .
Now if any moron has any doubts still to this day how this game is being played. fuck you.
Here is the gist of it, and its fact over fact contradicting bullshit over bullshit. black/white. period.
" (i) an error in law or in fact; "
well its been like that since day one. no facts from the "majority" side. And ignorance from the factual side, well I am sorry, fuck any dumbshit up to this point who dares to even try and argue up to this point.
over up to about 2 years now, the facts have been more than once published in several places all over the net, and the bullshit just as equally distributed. We dont need to understand why people still believe in the Telco's and I wont even give you the answer. Sincerely, If you have not done your own fucking research up to this point, then you must help yourself.
What more can you ask from Rocky. AND he even explicitly said that all of this not only affects him, but ultimately every other DSL wholesaler. But that is hardly the first place to find argument from this important submission.
My point: If the CRTC does not take this submission seriously, then we can WITHOUT A DOUBT conclude they are corrupt.
THEN we can use an analogy SUCH AS:
" 2+2=4! " " No it doesnt ... 2+2=5 "
this is the way the CRTC is making their decisions at this point in my eyes ( and we gave ... )
without basing on logic or facts, they decide on complete fabricated illogical nonsense. -- or else otherwise undisclosed conspiracy theories we would never know ,, ?
*rant done for now* 
BUT THANK YOU R0CKS ! =-)
-= DJ |
|
 | reply to R0CKY said by R0CKY:Gang, Couple comments... I would ask that no one forgets that this is an interim decision and not a final one so the arguments have to be made on the interim portion. Also, this is the first solo run for us and we're going to do this in a very strategic manner.... Also, we're not even close to being done with the twists and turns. Rocky good buddy ,
you guys take your time... and do it right 
in the meantime all we can do is continue letting our Country know about everything.
With simple facts over the contrary rampaging game being played, with everyone knowing it, theres no way "they" would ever be allowed to continue with such.
So from my side I am going to do what I can at least to make people know about it.
you did your part with the town hall meetings and protests and such, but it is ultimately up to the public at this point. Its gone over too long now.
and now you must focus on your "strategic" planning 
and again as always "we" will always be behind you. TSI Customer or not, this is about the overall future and state of our National Broadband 
Please take your time I Believe. I'll make others understand. (hopefully)  |
|
 2 edits | reply to globus999 said by globus999  Sorry but I disagree. Too little too late. By then UBB will be firmly encroached and TSI out of business. It sucks but such is reality. We are already living on borrowed time. Geez dude. What colour is the sky in your world?? Typical Canadian...roll over and play dead. |
|
 | reply to R0CKY Thanks rocky
I'm glad I switched to an ISP that isn't just in bed with Bell like my last ISP(b2b2c).
I'm proud to say that since Sept 1st when my service with Teksavvy came online I have also brought over 3 other clients to your service. I know 3 isn't much in relation to how many may leave if this bell thing goes through but its a start.
Hopefully those 3 spread the word aswell. |
|
 | reply to yokocar said by yokocar:said by globus999  Sorry but I disagree. Too little too late. By then UBB will be firmly encroached and TSI out of business. It sucks but such is reality. We are already living on borrowed time. Geez dude. What colour is the sky in your world?? Typical Canadian...roll over and play dead. Yur missing the point altogether. The point is that what Rock is doing is pointless. Much, much more agressive action is required, such a law-suit or a massive popular campaign. None of these two options are in scope or planned for. Therefore, I'll stick to my guns. This is "the" plan, we are doomed. Oh... Oh.. oh.. we don't have that much time either. |
|
 1 edit | said by globus999  Yur missing the point altogether. The point is that what Rock is doing is pointless. Much, much more agressive action is required, such a law-suit or a massive popular campaign. None of these two options are in scope or planned for. Therefore, I'll stick to my guns. This is "the" plan, we are doomed. Oh... Oh.. oh.. we don't have that much time either. 1. Protests don't work. Never have, never will. Case in point is the Tamil situation in Toronto a few months back. No one cared, until they turned to illegal tactics -which is NOT O.K.
2. 90% of the general internet public does not care/know about UBB, and it will take FAR too long to explain.
3. You need to fight the "powers" in the same arena that they won them in, in the tiny legal framework that we have with the CRTC. If the Indy ISP's can prove they will lose a serious amount of business, and that the proposed changes are anti-competitive they're more likely to re-examine the situation.
The CRTC is like a child in this space that needs to be taught...about the technologies/practices/polices that are employed. They literally have no idea what their decisions do.
Playing chicken-little will not work. I don't think you're in a good position to tell an ISP what he's doing is pointless-unless you run your own.
The CRTC will turn a blind-eye to a "Massive Popular Campaign". The CRTC in fact HATES when any company does this and is not likely to sway them. It would backfire.
Allow Rocky to play the game properly- with valid business case arguments. |
|
 | Rocky needs to invest in a few of these in order to have a fair fight. They're infinitely more effective than a whole firm of lawyers. |
|
 | said by MaynardKrebs:Rocky needs to invest in a few of these in order to have a fair fight. They're infinitely more effective than a whole firm of lawyers. ...and they have more class. |
|
 mlernerPremium join:2000-11-25 Nepean, ON kudos:5 | said by yokocar:said by MaynardKrebs:Rocky needs to invest in a few of these in order to have a fair fight. They're infinitely more effective than a whole firm of lawyers. ...and they have more class. LOL +1 |
|
 R0CKYTSI RockyPremium,VIP join:2005-05-19 Chatham, ON | LOL |
|