| ha T-Mobile needs a bigger data footprint. It's really pathetic. AT&T's is great, and have had no issues with them since I got my iphone 3GS.
--
»vivicalhosting.com - Reliable, and very affordable web hosting, VPS, and Dedicated solutions.
|
|
| said by ViviTheMage:T-Mobile needs a bigger data footprint. It's really pathetic. AT&T's is great, and have had no issues with them since I got my iphone 3GS. I'd call ATT 3G footprint 'good' but not great compared to Sprint/Verizon 3G footprint. |
|
 tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1
 ·T-Mobile US
| reply to ViviTheMage
said by ViviTheMage:T-Mobile needs a bigger data footprint. It's really pathetic. AT&T's is great, and have had no issues with them since I got my iphone 3GS. Considering TMO is rolling out new 3g in a city every 1.6 days, i'd say their "pathetic" footprint will be very different, very soon. Considering they're 3 YEARS late to the 3g game (thanks federal govt!), and their 3g network is already about 65% the size of ATT's, there's no reason to indicate that by this time next year, T-Mobile's 3g coverage will be any less than ATT's - if not better. Hell, just today, their twitter page announced another 3 cities - Peoria, IL, Bloomington, IL, and Lancaster, PA.
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara |
|
|
|
 Jovi
join:2000-02-24
Mount Joy, PA | SWEET! Now all I need is the Blackberry 9700 to come out and I'm all set.
--
"Some people have no respect for logic."  |
|
 GbcueAlmost P.E.Premium
join:2001-09-30
Santa Rosa, CA
kudos:8
 ·AT&T U-Verse
| reply to tiger72
said by tiger72:said by ViviTheMage:T-Mobile needs a bigger data footprint. It's really pathetic. AT&T's is great, and have had no issues with them since I got my iphone 3GS. Considering TMO is rolling out new 3g in a city every 1.6 days, i'd say their "pathetic" footprint will be very different, very soon. Considering they're 3 YEARS late to the 3g game (thanks federal govt!), and their 3g network is already about 65% the size of ATT's, there's no reason to indicate that by this time next year, T-Mobile's 3g coverage will be any less than ATT's - if not better. Hell, just today, their twitter page announced another 3 cities - Peoria, IL, Bloomington, IL, and Lancaster, PA. And those footprints when 3G is turned on is gigantic, not just a city, but most surrounding cities!
--
My BLOG!
Black Friday Ads |
|
 schmol
join:2001-12-26
Windsor, PA | reply to tiger72
I do believe most of Harrisburg and State college PA was also in that last deployment... |
|
tiger72SexaT duorPPremium
join:2001-03-28
Saint Louis, MO
kudos:1 Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| reply to tiger72
and a small update a mere 2 days later:
Raleigh, Durham, and Winston-Salem, NC; Greenville, SC; as well as Eastern and Northern San Diego County all got new 3g today.
Add those to the cities I posted about just 2 days ago, and you can clearly see that TMO definitely is getting/has it's stuff together when it comes to rolling out 3g.
--
"What makes us omniscient? Have we a record of omniscience? ...If we can't persuade nations with comparable values of the merit of our cause, we'd better reexamine our reasoning."
-United States Secretary of Defense (1961-1968) Robert S. McNamara |
|
