1 edit | reply to openbox9
Re: Karl? said by openbox9:That's kind of what I wrote. The engineers get a technical voice, but the lawyers make the rules legally defensible. Not the way I read it here... I got more of a "everything's fine, please move along.... Nothing to see" vibe from what you said... |
|
|
|
openbox9
join:2004-01-26
Alexandria, VA
kudos:2 | I left out the part about ensuring the lawyers make rules defensible, but I stated that the engineers should definitely have a voice. How did you discern "everything is fine here, nothing to see"? said by openbox9:They very well should have a voice in the matter, but they shouldn't be responsible for drafting policy. |
|
| said by openbox9:I left out the part about ensuring the lawyers make rules defensible, but I stated that the engineers should definitely have a voice. How did you discern "everything is fine here, nothing to see"? said by openbox9:They very well should have a voice in the matter, but they shouldn't be responsible for drafting policy. That's currently how things seem to be drafted, so that's all that I meant. I think the layers and marketing department give more input on these matters than the engineering department. No slam on attorneys and marketing people intended... |
|
