republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


ctg1701a
VIP
join:2008-08-07
Philadelphia, PA

reply to Woody79_00

Re: Bandwidth Meter

said by Woody79_00:

I quit using Comcast DNS Servers when they started the Advertisement Re directions...its worse than Closed DNS(OpenDNS)

I now use the National DNS Servers provided my Level 3 Networks

4.2.2.1
4.2.2.2

they are speedy, and no added junk..I likes
You could just as easily use the DNS servers here with no redirection:

»dns.comcast.net/dns-ip-addresses2.php

And get faster responses from a closer DNS server to you on the Comcast network.


cdru
Go Colts
Premium,MVM
join:2003-05-14
Fort Wayne, IN
kudos:5
Reviews:
·Frontier FiOS

said by ctg1701a:

You could just as easily use the DNS servers here with no redirection:

»dns.comcast.net/dns-ip-addresses2.php

And get faster responses from a closer DNS server to you on the Comcast network.
Define "faster" please.

ping 4.2.2.1 -n 10

Ping statistics for 4.2.2.1:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 17ms, Maximum = 23ms, Average = 18ms

ping 4.2.2.2 -n 10

Ping statistics for 4.2.2.2:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 19ms, Maximum = 21ms, Average = 19ms

ping 68.87.72.130 -n 10

Ping statistics for 68.87.72.130:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 27ms, Maximum = 30ms, Average = 27ms

ping 68.87.77.130 -n 10

Ping statistics for 68.87.77.130:
Packets: Sent = 10, Received = 10, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
Minimum = 61ms, Maximum = 67ms, Average = 62ms

The below queries were ran once to "cache" the lookup on the DNS server, then repeated 10x in succession to compute the average query response time:
dig www.dslreports.com. @4.2.2.1 = 29 ms
dig www.dslreports.com. @4.2.2.2 = 30 ms
dig www.dslreports.com. @68.87.72.130 = 39 ms
dig www.dslreports.com. @68.87.77.130 = 70 ms

From any definition of "faster" that I can think of relating to DNS, 4.2.2.1 and 4.2.2.2 were marginally to twice as fast as the "closer" Comcast provided server.

JnKC

join:2008-06-17
Independence, MO
Reviews:
·Comcast
·Comcast Digital ..

reply to ctg1701a
I don't get it! If we are talking about milliseconds, there aren't many differences. If we are talking about the presence of advertisements when u foul up a URL; who cares. I simply click the link to what I meant. If that is giving comcast more money, then I would like to see a discount for using the dns helpers. If not; who cares? I guess a blank page is better than saying you fouled up the URL dummy! Oh yeah; bandwidth meter would be fine if I could track u/d with router; otherwise it is a moot point.


Saturday, 02-Jun 14:52:03 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics