republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


RiseAbove
Premium
join:2004-01-30
Reviews:
·Verizon FiOS

reply to Z80

Re: Union & evidently Ct Attny Genrl can't grasp simple facts ..

said by Z80:

Why should AT&T be forced to offer better service than the gov't mandating the standards? More gov't,"do as I say, not as I do".
more than gov mandated? where does it say they are even meeting those standards setup by CT? If you read the thing it actually says they are still not meeting those standards and won't because it's to much of an inconvenience to have on call people to take care of things instead they make people wait.
--
Looking to get into Avaya telco if you might be in that field hit me up I have a lot of questions.

hottboiinnc
ME

join:2003-10-15
Cleveland, OH

True. And if ATT doesn't want or didn't want to ahere to those laws by CT they should have never taken over SNET when ATT was SBC. They knew up front what they were getting into and now they don't wanna do anything.



Z80
1 point 77
Premium
join:2009-08-31
Amerika

reply to RiseAbove
If AT&T is expected to meet standards, so should those enforcing the standards. The gov't should not demand of any business why they aren't willing to do themselves.

It is just typical government hypocrisy, the same type of hypocrisy that had Congress lecturing GM over flying in on a corporate yet and mismanagement when Congress voted themselves new jets and the government is the most mismanaged entity is the history of entities. But unlike government, businesses like AT&T can't just print money or raise taxes.


Saturday, 02-Jun 14:54:07 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics