<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;whr-hp-g54 tomato &#x22;Port Scan -- Not supported&#x22;&#x27; in forum &#x27;Buffalo Tech&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/whrhpg54-tomato-Port-Scan-Not-supported-23089921</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:25:45 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 12:25:45 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>whr-hp-g54 tomato &#x22;Port Scan -- Not supported&#x22;</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/whrhpg54-tomato-Port-Scan-Not-supported-23089921</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : I"m considering using Tomato on my stock WHR-HP-G54.  What does the Tomato documentation "Port Scan -- Not supported." mean?  <br><br>I have a static IP address and find that my router ignores many, many port scans.  <br><br>My main reason for considering Tomato is for prioritizing of packets.  <br><br>Recently I began sharing my network connection with a family member.  Consequently, my Wireless connection seems to receive very little bandwidth when their Wired connection is active.  <br><br>Looking at the past 5 days, my router logs show NMAP port scan attempts that have an average of 7.7 hits, with the longest duration being 3.5 days and 70 hits.  <br><br>Also the router regularly ignores a plethora of SMURF attacks, IP Spoofing, TCP Syn Flood, plus a new one: "invalid packets".  <br><br>My maximum bandwidth is quite low due to living in a remote area.  We are using point-to-point microwave for our internet connection.  <br><br>Thanks in advance for your time and dedication to helping others.  <br><br>-imwondering]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/whrhpg54-tomato-Port-Scan-Not-supported-23089921</guid>
<pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2009 10:02:41 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

