site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

reply to djrobx

Re: Coverage, coverage, coverage.

AT&T wants to be the most expensive provider, but considered a "Premium" service. They aren't in a hurry to compete on price.

Kearnstd
Elf Wizard
Premium
join:2002-01-22
Mullica Hill, NJ

said by KrK:

AT&T wants to be the most expensive provider, but considered a "Premium" service. They aren't in a hurry to compete on price.
im sure they like to pull that "we are the BMW of wireless" excuse for their prices. problem for AT&T is unlike cars there is another carrier willing to give me BMW quality at Kia prices.

one of reasons why they secured the iPhone exclusive, they have expensive service and know that right now they have the hottest selling smartphone for the past several years and you can only get it on their network(without jailbreak of course).
--
[65 Arcanist]Filan(High Elf) Zone: Broadband Reports


gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
kudos:3
Reviews:
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to KrK

said by KrK:

AT&T wants to be the most expensive provider, but considered a "Premium" service. They aren't in a hurry to compete on price.
Really they're the most expensive provider? What planet are you on? Verizon and AT&T charge the same amount for voice and basic data packages. Like I have stated I'm looking at going to Verizon or Sprint. One thing that irritates me about Verizon is the website is horrible trying to figure out pricing structure and wording of some data plans. Sprint's site is hit or miss on working.

Sprint and TMobile are the only big ones that are cheaper not counting cricket, metropcs, etc.


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK

Quadruple Play.... Try AT&T's pricing

OH and AT&T websites are terrible hodgepodges of mis-matched systems!



gdm
Premium,MVM
join:2001-06-15
Mchenry, IL
kudos:3

Verizon isn't???

Not sure what websites your looking at but honestly AT&T's is a bit better and as I stated I was talking about wireless for the websites.


Saturday, 02-Jun 20:01:59 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics