site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
100
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


funchords
Hello
Premium,MVM
join:2001-03-11
Yarmouth Port, MA
kudos:5

The GigaOm piece has some warning signs

»gigaom.com/2009/09/29/metered-br···zon-cto/

Lynch’s comments came amid a broad discussion about net neutrality, notably how a carrier can manage its network and deliver quality applications without running afoul of the principles. Given the rise in high-bandwidth applications and services Lynch said, “We believe that you have to be allowed to have a level of service that is not on a public Internet. What you’re suggesting is different kind of IP service that’s not delivered over the public Internet and that needs to be part of the option set in the argument.”

While he admitted that there are legitimate fears around net neutrality that need to be addressed, he differentiated between the public Internet and the idea of services that will require more than a best effort attempt at delivery. However, he said, “There are services that will not be happy on the public Internet, and we don’t want to be in a place where we have to provide the public Internet as the only place to deliver those services.”
That's rather non-technical talk for the Chief Technology Officer at Verizon, but it smacks of the notion that Verizon wants to be able to prioritize their premium services over those on the general-purpose Internet.

That's just wrong. I want to access my general-purpose Internet and just because you convince some other customer to pay $1 more than I do doesn't mean you get to take my access away in order to provide his.
--
Robb Topolski -= funchords.com =- District of Columbia -- KJ7RL
Test your Broadband connection today! -- »measurementlab.net/

Saturday, 02-Jun 20:05:44 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics