2 edits | It's okay to break caps if it's THEIR sanctioned service... at&t says it's okay. There will be no limit to how much bandwidth you can use if it is their service. I mean it's on THEIR network! They control their internet, er, network...
OTOH, Use Xbox live or PSN and you'll hit your cap while they see ca$h register signs! Cha Ching!
 | |
|
 | | Re: It's okay to break caps if it's THEIR sanctioned service... Does anyone remember Sega Channel?
Good idea, how well it is implemented and supported will determine it's success. | |
|
 | | | Re: It's okay to break caps if it's THEIR sanctioned service... said by RonnieB223:Does anyone remember Sega Channel? Good idea, how well it is implemented and supported will determine it's success. That was a decent channel. Prime Cable in Las Vegas offered that service. | |
|
| | | Does anyone remember Sega Channel? | |
|
| | | | Re: It's okay to break caps if it's THEIR sanctioned service... Sega Channel was awesome. If they can pull off the bandwidth demand (no caps), offer all-you-can eat gaming with a ton of good titles and keep it under $20/mo.......well, welcome back to Sega Channel, 2010 style. | |
|
| | | | | Re: It's okay to break caps if it's THEIR sanctioned service... said by SkyDancr:Sega Channel was awesome. If they can pull off the bandwidth demand (no caps), offer all-you-can eat gaming with a ton of good titles and keep it under $20/mo.......well, welcome back to Sega Channel, 2010 style. This is what we can all hope for  | |
|
| | While I agree with what you are saying, it sure sets off every net neutrality violation alarm that I have.
If OnLive user gets a "pass" on their AT&T data cap overages just because AT&T invests in OnLive then what about another start up company trying to compete with AT&T/OnLive while the other companies product runs through AT&T's network just the same?
"WARNING!!! WARNING!!! DANGER Will Robinson!!! DANGER!!!" | |
|
|
|
