Dissillusion
@ncf.ca
| So..the "Review of the Internet traffic management 2008-19"?
What can be expected from the CRTC with regards to this proceeding? I can't find anything in the file regarding what is to come next, or if the proceeding is deemed closed.
Should we be expecting a final commentary from the CRTC? Some "Lessons Learned" document? Anything? Or was it just a collosal waste of time/effort/money? Is the file closed?
I would hope that the CRTC would provide some type of release or commentary, wouldn't you?
Telecom Public Notice CRTC 2008-19
Review of the Internet traffic management practices of Internet service providers
»www.crtc.gc.ca/eng/archive/2008/···8-19.htm |
|
mlerner
Premium
join:2000-11-25
Nepean, ON | The CRTC is expected to issue guidelines to ISPs on IPTM use. That is no actual regulations. Basically nothing except what the CRTC would expect the ISPs to implement which we know will not be utilized by the incumbent providers. |
|
jfmezei
Premium
join:2007-01-03
Beaconsfield, QC
 ·ELECTRONICBOX
| The public hearings were a veil cover for a hearing on Bell's throttling of ISPs.
It is my uneducated and useless legal opinion that the CRTC will first decide (privately) on the R&V, then shape 2008-19 accordingly, announce the results with guidelines, and then announce the formal decision on the 2008-108 R&V stating using 2008-19 as justification for this decision.
For instance, say 2008-19 states that wholesalers can only throttle during instances of congestion, then the CRTC could then easily justify supporting the 2008-108 R&V stating that Bell should stop throttling 10 hours per day, whether there is congestion or not.
In other words, the results of 2008-19 will just be a support wall for the final decision on the R&V of 2008-108 to lean against. |
|
