 DrModemPremium join:2006-10-19 USA kudos:1 | Dollar to be dropped as the oil currency by 2018 quote: In the most profound financial change in recent Middle East history, Gulf Arabs are planning along with China, Russia, Japan and France to end dollar dealings for oil, moving instead to a basket of currencies including the Japanese yen and Chinese yuan, the euro, gold and a new, unified currency planned for nations in the Gulf Co-operation Council, including Saudi Arabia, Abu Dhabi, Kuwait and Qatar.
*snip*
Chinese financial sources believe President Barack Obama is too busy fixing the US economy to concentrate on the extraordinary implications of the transition from the dollar in nine years' time. The current deadline for the currency transition is 2018.
»www.independent.co.uk/news/busin···175.html
===========
This certainly will have profound implications for the US, both economically and politically. |
|
 FutureMonKeep your Mitts off RMoneyPremium,ExMod 2002-05 join:2000-10-05 Seaside, CA | Maybe this is the wake up call we need to start moving towards alternate fuels, so we don't rely on oil so much.
There's enough innovation already out there that could be tuned and further implemented in the span of the next 9 years.
- FM |
|
 dogmaXYZPremium join:2002-08-15 Boulder City, NV kudos:1 1 edit | reply to DrModem Excellent find. Serious stuff if true.
said by petrodollar warfare definition--> »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Petrodollar_warfare : The phrase petrodollar warfare refers to a hypothesis that a hidden, driving force of United States foreign policy over recent decades has been the status of the United States dollar as the world's dominant reserve currency and as the currency in which oil is priced. The term was coined by William R. Clark, who has written a book with the same title. The phrase oil currency wars is sometimes used with the same meaning.
Supporters of this hypothesis believe that the value of the U.S. dollar is determined by the fact that many key commodities (particularly oil and natural gas) are denominated in dollars. They believe that if the denomination changes to another currency, such as the euro, many countries would sell dollars and cause the banks to shift their reserves because they would no longer need dollars to buy oil and gas. This would weaken the dollar relative to the euro (see supply and demand). The core of the hypothesis is that U.S. administrations are greatly motivated by fear of the consequences of a weaker dollar, particularly higher oil prices. This motivation is seen as underlying and explaining many aspects of U.S. foreign policy, including the ongoing Iraq War.
Economists generally agree that higher oil prices pose a risk of inflation, recession, or both. Inflation would almost certainly rise if the dollar were to depreciate heavily.
At least one U.S. Representative, Republican Ron Paul of Texas, has made very strong statements advancing similar views, using the phrase dollar hegemony to describe U.S. policy and proposing related reforms
and said by dollar hegemony definition --> »en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dollar_hegemony : • All central banks have since been forced to hold more dollar reserves than they otherwise need to ward off sudden speculative attacks on their currencies in financial markets.
..."dollar hegemony" prevents the exporting nations from spending domestically the dollars they earn from the U.S. trade deficit and forces them to finance the U.S. capital account surplus, thus shipping real wealth to the U.S. in exchange for the privilege of financing U.S. debt to further develop the U.S. economy.
It should be noted that most of the above paragraph describes a controversial point of view. However, at the end of the 20th century it was for the most part undisputed that the US dollar is the most important reserve currency in the world.
Iraq's Saddam Hussein was waged war on, hunted down, and hung for attempting to sell oil in denominations other than US dollars.
said by U.S. Congressman Ron Paul--> »www.lewrockwell.com/paul/paul303.html : Most importantly, the dollar/oil relationship has to be maintained to keep the dollar as a preeminent currency. Any attack on this relationship will be forcefully challenged as it already has been.
In November 2000 Saddam Hussein demanded Euros for his oil. His arrogance was a threat to the dollar; his lack of any military might was never a threat. At the first cabinet meeting with the new administration in 2001, as reported by Treasury Secretary Paul ONeill, the major topic was how we would get rid of Saddam Hussein though there was no evidence whatsoever he posed a threat to us. This deep concern for Saddam Hussein surprised and shocked ONeill.
It's too early for me consider what the economic ramifications are at this point. Inflation (but NOT hyper-inflation) or a very prolonged recession (20 years+) is a forgone conclusion. Still hard to tell. Right now we are still playing out of the 1990 Japanese lost generation economic playbook. If average U.S. income can get down another 25%, then as companies rehire, they will be more profitable. Some manageable inflation would be welcome, perhaps 12% to 15% like in the 1980's. Also manufacturing will return as onshore plants can be globally competitive. ...and this would be the "good news scenario".
If we continue to print money to deflate our way out, this is what you "youngin's" (12 - 35 years old) should expect for your soon-to-be miserable ass lives (BTW, you guys can thank the self-centered, materialistic, cowardly, and pathetic "Baby-Boomer" generation for creating this mess and sliding you the sausage with no Vaseline):
said by BusinessWeek--> »www.businessweek.com/globalbiz/c···4046.htm : There's an entire generation of people in their late 20s and early 30s who came of age during Japan's so-called lost decade [from about 1990 to 2003] , a stretch of economic stagnation that started to ease in 2003. Through that period, with Japanese companies in retrenchment mode, young people faced what came to be known as a "hiring ice age." Many settled for odd jobs or part-time work to make ends meet but hoped eventually to find their way into regular employment with the stars of corporate Japan. Instead, they're being passed over in favor of new graduatesa serious problem in a country that still values lifetime employment and frowns on midcareer job-hopping.
This group is called the "lost" or "suffering" generation. Some 3.3 million Japanese aged 25 to 34 work as temps or contract employees.
These millions of young people face a life that's vastly different from that of their parents. For Japan's postwar baby boomers, jobs provided certainty, spurring them to partner and procreate. Faced with insecurity, many of Japan's twenty- and thirtysomethings are doing neither.
Sorry for the long post, but if this event comes to pass, there will be even more economic pain, and perhaps for the very long haul...but still no Armageddon. |
|
|
|
 SnakeoilIgnore Button. The coward's feature.Premium join:2000-08-05 Mentor, OH kudos:1 | reply to DrModem gmm things should be interesting. -- A is A. |
|
 | reply to dogma said by dogma:Inflation (but NOT hyper-inflation) or a very prolonged recession (20 years+) is a forgone conclusion. If all of the foreign countries start selling their U.S. treasuries to hold money in other currencies, then the Fed would have to print the money to pay them. With tax revenues declining from the recession and trillion dollar budget deficits as far as the eye can see, hyperinflation would be the result. Americans would not be able to afford imports. |
|
 dogmaXYZPremium join:2002-08-15 Boulder City, NV kudos:1 | said by Spice300: If all of the foreign countries start selling their U.S. treasuries to hold money in other currencies, ... Americans would not be able to afford imports. Yes. Right. Exactly right.
Thus the chances of other countries selling off so much dollar based reserves would be a questionable ploy. America would not consume at the rate the rest of the world has become accustomed to, and therefore send any and all foreign economies into turmoil as well ['scuse the intended pun].
I think of it as "vendor financing". Or even better, owing ones soul to the "company store". Our creditors have no profit motive to pull the reserve currency rug out from underneath us. Yeah, that would cause all kinds of economic storms here, possibly including hyperinflation. But it would also mean our creditor overlords would NEVER be paid the interest they want.
Just like the company store, or vendor financing, ...or VISA and Mastercard for that matter, the idea is not to get paid off, but to keep the sucker on the hook forever as he tries to pay it all off. |
|
 | reply to DrModem Look this is a depression, and all of it has been false from the start, and thank god a few months ago a member no longer with us recommended to buy gold and he was so right about the banks.
I just wish he would come back cause the guy is missed. |
|
 | reply to dogma China and India are rising consumer nations while the U.S. is importing less. The current trend indicates the U.S. consumer is descending toward irrelevance because their debt based purchasing power has collapsed. Due to the alt-A and option ARM resets looming in 2011, the U.S. has little chance of recovery until spring 2013. The failure to meaningfully reform U.S. financial markets means we can expect more economic carnage rooted in the greed of Wall Street titans. The U.S. and Canadian economies are more vulnerable to additional oil price shocks than China, Europe and oil exporting countries. The loss of Mexican oil revenue due to their production peaking may result in a war on our southern border that would distract us. The world sees the writing on the wall and is trying to rid itself of U.S. baggage by dumping the petrodollar. |
|
 dogmaXYZPremium join:2002-08-15 Boulder City, NV kudos:1 | reply to BankBuster said by BankBuster :
...and thank god a few months ago a member no longer with us recommended to buy gold... In the past 6 Months, gold has risen in value by 16.66%. Unfortunately for those that could have bought into a DOW index fund, which gained over 20% in the same time period, they missed out.
OK> /troll/lock service restart
said by Spice300:China and India are rising consumer nations while the U.S. is importing less. ... The world sees the writing on the wall and is trying to rid itself of U.S. baggage by dumping the petrodollar. I see where your logic originates, but I ain't buying it. From my research and experience, the U.S. still consumes 5x it's weight year over year. Check this out: »www.globalpolicy.org/component/c···200.html
(to save you some research time, 2007=(-708B) and 2008=(-673B))
Are you suggesting these past 2 years are the onset of a long term trend?
hint: pay careful attention to recession years 1979-1983 and 1989-1994. |
|
 DrModemPremium join:2006-10-19 USA kudos:1 | Oil states are denying this now:
»uk.biz.yahoo.com/06102009/325/oi···dlr.html |
|
 John GaltForward, MarchPremium join:2004-09-30 Happy Camp kudos:3 | reply to DrModem Interview with Robert Fisk, the author of the story, on AlJazeera...
»www.youtube.com/watch?v=CBDPGkW6SCU -- The man who speaks to you of sacrifice is speaking of slaves and masters, and intends to be the master.
|
|
 The PigBazinaPremium join:2009-09-11 | reply to DrModem I know everyone believes in what the media (government controled) says about the U.S. needing Arab oil, but that is one of the biggest lies around. There are billions and billions of barrels of oil all across the U.S. (and don't leave out natural gas too) but we won't touch it until the price hits well over $300 a barrel if not even higher. Solar power will not work (no sun no power), electric cars will not work (it would cost a few of hundred trillion dollars to wire up every street in every city), wind power will also fail (no wind no power). -- »www.ip-adress.com/ip_tracer/ |
|
 badtripI heart the East BayPremium join:2004-03-20 Albany, CA | said by The Pig:Solar power will not work (no sun no power), electric cars will not work (it would cost a few of hundred trillion dollars to wire up every street in every city), wind power will also fail (no wind no power). It looks like you don't understand how solar energy and wind is used to store energy.
It also looks like you don't understand how electric cars work; they are not like electric buses or electric rail cars -- electric cars don't need a 3rd rail or a electric cable suspended above the street to draw power.
In both case, rechargeable batteries are used. |
|
 IIIBradIIIComm M-E-L Instr join:2000-09-28 Greer, SC Reviews:
·T-Mobile US
| said by badtrip:In both case, rechargeable batteries are used. Yes, but they are the weak link in the chain. Until someone comes up with (and is allowed to bring to market affordably) a capacitor/battery an order of magnitude better than our current choices, electricity will never be our energy of choice for personal transportation. |
|
 badtripI heart the East BayPremium join:2004-03-20 Albany, CA | said by IIIBradIII:said by badtrip:In both case, rechargeable batteries are used. Yes, but they are the weak link in the chain. Until someone comes up with (and is allowed to bring to market affordably) a capacitor/battery an order of magnitude better than our current choices, electricity will never be our energy of choice for personal transportation. And I agree with you 100%. |
|
 The PigBazinaPremium join:2009-09-11 1 edit | reply to badtrip To go totally electric on cars you'd need a generator the size of a mac truck to run it without the help of OIL. The generator in your car now only keeps your tiny battery charged because the battery doesn't use that much electric. Do you really believe you can drive cross country or even a few hundred miles without a recharge from an outside source? Solar power stores power in batteries that can and will break down one way or another, any idea on how long it would take to find a bunch of dead ones amoung a few million of them? How many solar panels/batteries do you think a state like New York or California would need to supply everyone with power and how much will something like that cost? now mulitipy that by 49. And what happens when it's cloudy for weeks on end? And/or the wind doesn't blow? You really think it's a wise idea to depend on Mother Nature for power? -- »www.ip-adress.com/ip_tracer/ |
|
 | reply to dogma I think our difference in perception comes from my inclusion of peak oil. I think that peak oil will kill globalization either by making fuel expensive or scarce or by the resulting economic carnage reducing demand. By buying up resources around the world China seems to recognize what is on the horizon while the U.S. continues partying blissfully unaware into the night. The U.S. is heading for a prolonged depression which will decimate our service based economy and thereby reduce demand. Due to an insubstantial economy and utter failure at economic reform, China sees the U.S. consumer receding toward irrelevance. China's economic future lies in the rise of its domestic consumers and diversifying its exports to the world.
U.S. Imports from China through July 2009 shows that instead of increasing at an annual rate of 5.1% between 2007 and 2008, imports are down 7.8% since July 2008 compared to 2008. This is not what China wants. |
|
 badtripI heart the East BayPremium join:2004-03-20 Albany, CA | reply to The Pig Where I live there are many, many people who use electric vehicles as their primary transportation. There are distance limits and the technology isn't quite there yet for the mainstream but I'll bet that unless something catastrophic happens in the US, vehicles that are primarily electric powered will be mainstream within 20 years (and probably less).
Oil, of course will be around for a long long time. I won't argue against that.
said by The Pig:You really think it's a wise idea to depend on Mother Nature for power? I think that is the WISEST idea. Hell, it's good enough for every other living being on the planet, it's good enough for us.
You do realize you completely depend on "Mother Nature" to power your body, do you not? |
|
 | reply to The Pig said by The Pig:To go totally electric on cars you'd need a generator the size of a mac truck to run it without the help of OIL. What do you imagine to be the fuel for the generator if not gasoline or diesel? The generator in a Prius is much smaller than a Mac truck although it runs off of gasoline. Ethanol, biodiesel, hydrogen, ammonia and natural gas are other possible fuels, none of which require oversized generators.
Take a look at plug-in series hybrid vehicles (PHEV) in which a battery is recharged by plugging it into the wall. Initially the vehicle runs off of the battery for several miles. The GM Volt's battery range will be 40 miles. The battery can also be recharged partially by regenerative braking. When the battery discharges to a predetermined point, a liquid fueled generator turns on to provide the average amount of electricity needed to propel the car. If the driver floors the accelerator, some electricity will come from the generator and some from the battery to give him the needed power. Electric cars are 3 to 5 times more energy efficient than gasoline powered ICE ones. This method provides an extended range of hundreds of miles while greatly reducing liquid fuel consumption (~75%) because the majority of local travel uses electricity from the grid. The liquid fuel consumption is reduced enough that perhaps biofuels can provide enough liquid fuel for long range travel. It is also easy to modify a PHEV to use different types of liquid fuels because the worst case would require replacing the generator and fuel tank as opposed to removing the ICE and fuel tank of a conventional car.
said by The Pig:Solar power stores power in batteries that can and will break down one way or another... There are several ways to store electrical energy besides using batteries. One that is already practical is pumped hydroelectricity.
One portion of your argument seems to assume that all of our electricity might be provided by photovoltaic arrays. Consider the situation in which we use several different methods of generating electricity: photovoltaic, solar thermal, wind, hydroelectric, geothermal and nuclear fusion. Photovoltaic systems without storage are good for providing peak power demands during the sunny summer when air conditioners are running during the day. Solar thermal systems are easy to build with storage tanks for overnight or cloudy days. Pumped hydroelectric can be combined with wind and solar to increase the amount of continuous electricity. Wind turbines can be interconnected across long distances. If you have a high voltage power line over a long distance rail line that extends 3,000 miles from east to west across the U.S., the odds are really high that at any given moment the wind will be blowing somewhere along the transmission line providing a certain minimum amount of continuous power.
said by The Pig:... any idea on how long it would take to find a bunch of dead ones amoung a few million of them? A battery array that huge would be built fault tolerant allowing a bad cell to be automatically isolated from the array. The Li-ion battery used in the Tesla Roadster is designed in this fashion.
said by The Pig:How many solar panels/batteries do you think a state like New York or California would need to supply everyone with power and how much will something like that cost? There is enough roof area on U.S. houses for photovoltaic and solar hot water systems to provide all the electricity and hot water that those houses consume. There is not enough roof area on apartments, high rise buildings and industrial buildings for their consumption. Again there is no requirement that solar panels mounted on roofs provide all of the power by themselves.
said by The Pig:And what happens when it's cloudy for weeks on end? I have had an off-grid photovoltaic system for more than 18 years, and have never run out of electricity. On cloudy days the PV panels output about 20% to 25% of the power on sunny days. If one sizes the system appropriately or reduces power consumption on cloudy days, there is no problem. It is a matter of cost and preference.
said by The Pig:You really think it's a wise idea to depend on Mother Nature for power? All of our power sources come from Mother Nature, even crude oil which was originally solar power. Do you think it is a wise idea to depend on finite, depleting and polluting fossil fuels for power until the last drop or your last breath? |
|
 The PigBazinaPremium join:2009-09-11 2 edits | reply to DrModem Ok we can agree all the points of the good and the bad. But, when it comes down to the main factor, as of now without price increases which there will be many it would cost me close to $50,000 to run my home completely with just solar power how much would it cost to power a city? How much will it cost you to go solar? Make that 50% 100% and post your cost. »www.findsolar.com/index.php?page=rightforme
Forget OIL and GAS for now and just think SOLAR. -- »www.ip-adress.com/ip_tracer/ |
|