<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;[Windows] Firewall need on a server box?&#x27; in forum &#x27;Security&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Windows-Firewall-need-on-a-server-box-23154632</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:53:44 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:53:44 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>[Windows] Firewall need on a server box?</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Windows-Firewall-need-on-a-server-box-23154632</link>
<description><![CDATA[anon posted : Hi,<br><br>Our company has a few windows server 2003 boxes. All workstations and servers are on the same VLAN.<br><br>In the past, there was an admin installing a application filtering firewall on each server.<br><br>Now, there is a new admin trying to remove them on each server. We all disagree but he claims it's slow down the traffic on the server.<br><br>I am like, All servers will slow down traffic within 5-10% margin as it's checking packets. I don't think that with the firewall on the top of TCP/IP layer, the server can sustain in 100% bandwidth of the traffic.<br><br>He argues that there is no need to put a firewall in an argument sake. He claims even tho he enables a full allow for both inbound and outbound, it's still slowing down.<br><br>Can anybody give me some of your opinon about this situation?<br><br>Thanks.<br><br>Jackson]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Windows-Firewall-need-on-a-server-box-23154632</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 20:22:38 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

