republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Lazlow

join:2006-08-07
Saint Louis, MO

reply to RARPSL

Re: Per-Byte Billing Is Neither Necessary Nor Inevitable

While I agree that a fixed base charge is reasonable and correct, charging based upon GBs downloaded is not related to the ISPs costs( so the car analogy fails here). Both transit costs and hardware costs are entirely based upon peak Mbps. Any GBs downloaded during non peak hours incurs no additional costs for the ISP, yet they want to charge for them. Since their costs are related to peak Mbps and their (current) tiers are priced by Mbps, the current situation(flat rate) is fair. IF they temporarily need to handle traffic issues during peak hours they can implement proticol agnostic throttling such as what Comcast uses(again temporarily, during peak hours, until capacity can be upgraded). Just look at the ISP's filings, they are not even close to loosing money on the internet side.

Saturday, 02-Jun 08:53:03 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics