site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
121
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


KrK
Heavy Artillery For The Little Guy
Premium
join:2000-01-17
Tulsa, OK
Reviews:
·AT&T DSL Service

Wouldn't this make it easy for malware pushers etc

... For miscreants to try to connect to people's PDA's, Phones, Laptops, Netbooks, Smartphones etc etc

Imagine one crook and a crowded public place (like a Metro train) and I think he'd be able to "hook up" with people's devices.

There has to be some kind of security or the uninitiated will be like lambs to the slaughter.
--
"Fascism should more properly be called corporatism because it is the merger of state and corporate power." -- Benito Mussolini

rahvin112

join:2002-05-24
Sandy, UT

This has nothing to do with bluetooth.

Adhoc Wifi isn't going to replace Bluetooth. Do you all forget what Bluetooth is and why it was created? Wifi uses a LOT of power. If I enable Wifi on my Phone/PDA my battery will be dead in 4 hours. I enable Bluetooth on my phone and I get about 1 and a half days. Bluetooth was invented to be a short distance LOW power wireless transmission protocol. Bluetooth doesn't have much security because after about 5' the signal is so weak it's worthless, to hack someone with Bluetooth you almost need to be sitting in their lap or have a power boosting directional antenna (and I'm not even sure that would work because you can probably boost your signal to the device but the device isn't going to be boosting it's return signal, so you can talk to it from a distance but you can't hear a response).

Making Adhoc automatic doesn't make wifi competitive with Bluetooth because of the power issue. Until you can provide a protocol that uses less power than Bluetooth (less than 5 milliwatts) you aren't going to replace it. (as an aside, this lack of distance is about 90% of the Bluetooth complaints you will hear, I've seen devices that didn't work if it was more than 1' from the receiving device)

patcat88

join:2002-04-05
Jamaica, NY
kudos:1

reply to KrK

Re: Wouldn't this make it easy for malware pushers etc

said by KrK:

There has to be some kind of security or the uninitiated will be like lambs to the slaughter.
They already are. They need barcodes on their forehead to authenticate themselves to their CE.

Saturday, 02-Jun 02:14:11 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics