republican-creole
site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
91
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

Samsonian

join:2007-06-15

WiMAX is cheaper

I'm not buying this. I've seen several hardware vendors and operators say that WiMAX equipment is cheaper than 3G, both on the BS and CPE side (USB dongles are no more than $50). In spite of the fact that 3G has been around longer and has more scale and volume.

This is partly because of the patent situation. 15-20% of the device's price is royalties to various patent holders. Qualcomm has made billions in net profit off this insanity, and everybody else would like to as well. The thing is, the patent situation isn't going to get better for LTE. It looks just as bad as 3G, if not worse.

www.slideshare.net/pacificleo/mo···ue-chain'

Why would almost every greenfield/emerging operator be choosing WiMAX over cellco technology?

Without a customer base on legacy technology, you'd pick the cheapest and most capable technology available.

That's WiMAX.


en102
Canadian, eh?

join:2001-01-26
Valencia, CA

I suspect Intel needs to pay back for its investors on WiMAX, and cost will be high until there's decent competition.


Saturday, 02-Jun 02:19:34 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics