site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

jus10

join:2009-08-04
Sterling, VA
Reviews:
·Comcast

reply to djrobx

Re: We had a little theater it is time to go to the lobby.

I don't really think that in the long term AT&T or Verizon have much to fear. They'll just jack up the data prices to cover the usage.

Their resistance is based on fear and frankly, rather dumb. Build the next gen networks so its all data. VoIP, SMS, email, all just packets. Then charge for X amount of data per month. VoIP costs packets and a percentage total of the data per month.

I have texting blocked on my iPhone completely. Paying X amount per message for something which can be included in an email is dumb. Bundle everything together as one data blob and be done with it.

Fisamo
Premium
join:2004-02-20
Apex, NC

said by jus10:

I don't really think that in the long term AT&T or Verizon have much to fear. They'll just jack up the data prices to cover the usage.
Exactly right--they'll jack up the data price to cover the usage. The fear arises from having to build a new business model, being the first to the market with the new more expensive data plans with usage allowances that people will want (but probably won't want to pay for). However, that does raise two fears--one short term, the other long term.

In the short term, the 'innovator' company that adopts this bruise-ness model will take it in the shorts, until enough people come to the conclusion (whether right or wrong) that a commodity-priced bandwidth plan (at a sustainable price point) is best... In other words, a commodity-bandwidth style plan (e.g. all handset use is metered by data instead of minutes, whether voice, web browsing, messaging, etc) would probably have to be introduced as a loss leader (either priced lower than current PC card plans, with higher usage allowances, or both) to gain adoption, IMO.
Then, the long-term fear kicks in. The wireless companies will have to compete (or collude, such as in TXT message pricing?) based on bandwidth, caps, and service reliability, with no 'premium content' leverage.

It's reasonable to predict that we will go this route eventually, the big questions are when, and how much money will be spent to delay the inevitable?


FBGuy
yippee ki yay
Premium
join:2005-03-19
Reviews:
·Comcast
·T-Mobile US
·AT&T U-Verse

reply to jus10

said by jus10:

I don't really think that in the long term AT&T or Verizon have much to fear. They'll just jack up the data prices to cover the usage.

Their resistance is based on fear and frankly, rather dumb. Build the next gen networks so its all data. VoIP, SMS, email, all just packets. Then charge for X amount of data per month. VoIP costs packets and a percentage total of the data per month.

I have texting blocked on my iPhone completely. Paying X amount per message for something which can be included in an email is dumb. Bundle everything together as one data blob and be done with it.
if it gets to the point where they don't have anything to fear, then they need broken up again to create more competition. thats the only thing AT&T is afraid of. their costs are not an issue.

Saturday, 02-Jun 15:22:40 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics