site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
421
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies

dynodb
Premium,VIP
join:2004-04-21
Minneapolis, MN

Shocking

FCC study concludes that greater FCC authority would be better. What a surprise.

I fail to see how penetration would be increased by reducing potential revenue and increasing the return on investment for new deployments. It defies logic.

Want to increase penetration and lower costs? For a start, take on the extortionist tactics of municipalities that add time and expense to new deployments. See Verizon's prolonged efforts to get FOiS into NYC as an example.


fifty nine

join:2002-09-25
Sussex, NJ
kudos:1

said by dynodb:

Want to increase penetration and lower costs? For a start, take on the extortionist tactics of municipalities that add time and expense to new deployments. See Verizon's prolonged efforts to get FOiS into NYC as an example.
What extortionist tactics? You mean like guaranteeing that the service will be rolled out to every area of the city?

Alareth

join:2006-12-27
Lamar, MS

reply to dynodb

FCC study concludes that greater FCC authority would be better. What a surprise.
The report was not created or authored by the FCC.

It was done by Harvard University's Berkman Center for Internet and Society. The funding for the study was also not from the government. It was paid for by the Ford and McArthur Foundations.


ReformCRTC
Support Your Independent ISP

join:2004-03-07
Canada

The same people that sponsor many of PBS's Frontline episodes.


Saturday, 02-Jun 15:24:50 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics