site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Uniqs:
86
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


INsano

@clearwire-wmx.net

Wimax

Yes...LTE has big backers. But I'm not going to be able to get LTE for $27.50 a month.

Price? I get the "6mb" Clearwire tier here in Portland, this has no monthly bandwidth cap. Speeds range from 3-12mb/s down. I have a USB dongle plugged into my laptop that serves as my home and mobile internet connection.

6 months ago, Qwest was still trying to charge $39.99/month for 1.5mb DSL. Now it's $14.99/month for them. Competition, as others have mentioned, is a good thing for consumers.

Also, I think it's worth noting, that while yes, it's nice to have faster speeds(LTE, WiMax2), most consumers don't need it. If they can stream YouTube, that's pretty much the most they'd need. So while LTE has higher theoretical speeds, the price difference may be a large factor for WiMax. In the same way you can get 100mb cable now, but most people have 8-12mb. They're not going to pay $120 a month for that upper tier because they don't really need it.


Yesbut

@ntelos.net

Good point for the present but as more device are brought to market and video communications become a standard with options like live IP high definition broadcast television the demand will swell. Of course it will all need backhaul and infrastructure. They could not possible grow LTE 4g very fast anyway it will bring down a switch or overload a base station radio point with streaming data at those speeds in saturated markets. Perhaps Sprint has a good idea with WiMax rolling out now. Very curious.


Saturday, 02-Jun 15:24:50 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics