<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

<rss version="2.0" xmlns:blogChannel="http://backend.userland.com/blogChannelModule">

<channel>
<title>Topic &#x27;Flash test results are artificially high&#x27; in forum &#x27;Site Tools&#x27; - dslreports.com</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23196404</link>
<description></description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:34:41 EDT</pubDate>
<lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 13:34:41 EDT</lastBuildDate>

<item>
<title>Re: Flash test results are artificially high</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23199303</link>
<description><![CDATA[Irish Shark posted : Flash tests are worse than Java tests. I would just disregard the Flash results.<br><br>When you see something that just does not make any sense, try different test sites and make a caparison of what the results are.<br><small>--<br>"You can observe a lot by watching". Yogi Berra</small>]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23199303</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:29:12 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Flash test results are artificially high</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23199057</link>
<description><![CDATA[mw1597 posted : With the Java test there is no difference in speed when Anti-Virus is on or off.  I'm getting 4250 with Java (with or without Anti-Virus).  ]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23199057</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 13:16:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Re: Flash test results are artificially high</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23198818</link>
<description><![CDATA[Irish Shark posted : Do you see the same results with a Java test?]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Re-Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23198818</guid>
<pubDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:55:48 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

<item>
<title>Flash test results are artificially high</title>
<link>http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23196404</link>
<description><![CDATA[mw1597 posted : I'm getting results that are to good to be true when running the Flash speed test.  Sometimes as high as 5700 Kb/s on AT&T DSL Elite (rated up to 6000).<br><br>I noticed that when I disable Kaspersky Anti-Virus and run the Flash speed test the results drop to about 4300 Kb/s. <br><br>So I get 5700 with Anti-Virus on and 4300 with Anti-Virus off.  Doesn't make sence to me.  Can someone explain what is happening?  <br><br>Thanks,<br>  Mike]]></description>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.dslreports.com/forum/Flash-test-results-are-artificially-high-23196404</guid>
<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 18:41:34 EDT</pubDate>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

