site Search:


 
    All Forums Hot Topics Gallery






how-to block ads


 
Search Topic:
Share Topic
Post a:
Post a:
AuthorAll Replies


vzw emp

@qwest.net

reply to baineschile

Re: So basically....

said by baineschile:

Also, dont forget; municipal fiber services may be cheaper; but the government can make up the money in an area where private business cant: taxes. So, if your cable bill goes down $50 by switching, but your taxes go up the same amount, is is really worth it?
I understand that's a concern for some people, but where has that happened? Even in areas where the muni project went belly up I don't believe they raised tax rates to compensate. I think this is one of the examples cited by opponents of muni-broadband to drum up opposition to those projects.

I worked for AT&T in the late 1990's/early 2000's when line sharing was still in effect. AT&T knows line sharing works and even took advantage of the 1996 Telecom Act by offering local phone service (pre SBC merger and before long distance companies were allowed to re-enter the local phone market). AT&T offered local phone service in areas served by ILEC's across the country and were doing quite well. We had a backlog of new orders and LNP requests.

I think this fact taught AT&T (and others) 2 things. First, line sharing works. Second, if their customers had another option they would drop their current carrier, leaving AT&T and the other ILEC's (or ISP's for that matter) scrambling to win them back.

Saturday, 02-Jun 09:00:20 Terms of Use & Privacy | feedback | contact | Hosting by nac.net - DSL,Hosting & Co-lo
over 12.5 years online © 1999-2012 dslreports.com.
Most commented news this week
Hot Topics